MIL Email Publisher (NZ)

Source: Reserve Bank of New Zealand – Te Pūtea Matua

2 September 2026

The Monetary Policy Committee today reached consensus to increase the OCR to 25 basis points to 2.75 percent.

Inflation increased to 4.1 percent in the June quarter because of higher fuel prices arising from the conflict in the Middle East. Core inflation, expected wage growth, and inflation expectations remain consistent with inflation returning to the 1 to 3 percent target band by mid-2027 and the 2 percent target midpoint later next year.

After lacklustre growth in the June quarter, New Zealand's economic recovery has most likely resumed but remains uneven. Resilient demand from New Zealand’s trading partners and strong export prices are supporting income growth and investment in export-exposed sectors and regional New Zealand. In contrast, weak income growth, job insecurity, and flat house prices continue to weigh on household spending and residential investment, particularly in Auckland and Wellington.

The recovery is expected to strengthen and broaden. The Committee expects New Zealand’s export sector to remain resilient and household spending to gradually increase. Conditions in the labour market should improve as the recovery gathers pace. Purchasing power will increase as inflation returns to the 2 percent target mid-point.

The global economy is facing significant risks that could affect commodity prices and demand for exports. New Zealand’s economic recovery could be stronger or weaker than expected and price pressures could generate more persistent inflation. The Committee remains vigilant and will respond as necessary to ensure inflation returns sustainably to the 2 percent target mid-point over the medium term.

The Committee judges that gradually removing monetary stimulus is appropriate to return inflation to the 2 percent target mid-point while supporting growth and employment. This decision reduces the risk that the OCR needs to increase by more later. Future policy decisions will depend on the Committee’s judgement of the balance of risks to medium-term inflation.

Summary record of meeting – September 2026

Annual consumers price index inflation is above the Monetary Policy Committee’s 1 to 3 percent target range. Inflation increased to 4.1 percent in the June 2026 quarter, largely driven by higher fuel and related prices due to the Middle East conflict. The Committee is setting monetary policy to return inflation to 2 percent by late 2027. Economic activity is expected to strengthen and broaden.

Inflation is forecast to fall to 2 percent by late 2027

The Committee expects inflation to remain elevated this year before returning to the target band by mid-2027 and reaching the 2 percent mid-point later next year. Excluding vehicle fuels, annual CPI inflation decreased to 2.9 percent in the June quarter. Most measures of core inflation are within the 1 to 3 percent target band.

As the effects of higher fuel prices drop out of the annual CPI calculation, spare capacity and the gradual removal of monetary stimulus are expected to support inflation returning to the 2 percent target mid-point.

Forward-looking indicators of inflation and spare capacity are consistent with achieving the medium-term target. Longer-term inflation expectations remain near 2 percent, while most measures of one- and two-year-ahead inflation expectations have fallen since May. Expected wage growth is consistent with returning inflation to 2 percent.

Trading partner inflation has increased and export prices remain resilient

High and volatile energy and petrochemical-derived product prices have increased inflation in many of New Zealand’s trading partners, increasing import prices. Global supply chains, refining capacity, and trade flows remain disrupted.

Despite recent geopolitical events, economic growth in New Zealand’s trading partners has remained resilient and the outlook has improved. Continued demand and supply-side constraints in global food markets have resulted in elevated prices for New Zealand’s commodity exports. This is partly offsetting higher import prices, and New Zealand’s terms of trade are projected to resume their long-run upward trend.

New Zealand’s economic recovery is resuming and expected to broaden

The Committee assessed that growth was lacklustre in the second quarter of 2026. The economic recovery is expected to have resumed in the third quarter, while remaining uneven across sectors and regions.

The Committee noted that economic conditions remain favourable for households and businesses exposed to the export sector, contributing to a recovery in business investment. Resilient trading-partner demand and strong export prices are supporting activity in the South Island and some North Island regions.

The Committee assessed that positive spillovers from the export sector into the broader economy have been limited. Households and businesses more exposed to the domestic economy continue to face challenging conditions.

Employment growth has not been sufficient to fully absorb new entrants into the labour market and unemployment is elevated, particularly in Auckland and Wellington and for youth and the long-term unemployed. Some households are moving to regions with stronger labour markets as part of this economic adjustment.

In some regions, job insecurity and falling real house prices may be contributing to precautionary behaviour. Household saving rates have increased and consumption growth remains weak. Strong growth in dwelling consents has not yet translated into residential construction nationwide.

Household consumption growth is expected to gradually strengthen. The labour market is expected to slowly improve, with employment growing and unemployment falling as the economy recovers. A pick up in real income growth and a modest recovery in house prices supported by past and current monetary stimulus is expected to strengthen household balance sheets, consumer confidence and spending. Improvements in the terms of trade from next year will also support national income growth over the forecast period.

On balance, the Committee assesses that spare capacity remains in the economy, particularly in the labour market. Looking forward, strength in the external sector and the effects of accommodative monetary policy will continue to support and broaden the recovery, absorbing spare capacity over the medium term.

Financial conditions have tightened in recent months

Domestic financial conditions have tightened. Higher wholesale interest rates have led to a comparable increase in bank mortgage and business lending rates and a small appreciation in the exchange rate, partly reflecting expectations of future OCR increases.

The Committee noted a more limited pass through of higher wholesale interest rates to term deposit rates, which is lowering the cost of new funding for banks. A greater pass through to deposit rates would be more consistent with the desired stance and transmission of monetary policy.

Members agreed that domestic financial stability continues to pose no material trade-off to its inflation objective.

Risks to global and domestic economic growth

The Committee discussed risks to the global outlook. There are significant risks to financial stability from the serviceability of public and private debt and ongoing fiscal deficits. Geopolitical instability also continues to present considerable risks. Uncertainties remain about the sustainability of various asset valuations, including for AI-related investments.

El Niño weather conditions do not necessarily imply that New Zealand will experience a drought. However, adverse global and local weather events can impact supply, posing upside risk to commodity and food prices. Although risks to the global economy remain heightened, the Committee expects global economic conditions to remain favourable for New Zealand’s export-facing businesses over the medium term.

Members discussed risks to New Zealand’s economic recovery. Consumption growth could be subdued if employment and house price growth remain weak, or if precautionary behaviour persists. If this were to occur, the recovery could be weaker and current unevenness could continue. Alternatively, consumption growth could be stronger and absorb spare capacity faster than currently anticipated.

Members highlighted that the real economy is showing signs of adjusting to a range of structural changes, but transitions can be slow and contribute to divergences across sectors and regions. It was noted that monetary policy cannot influence the ultimate path of these real adjustments.

The Committee remains vigilant to inflation risks

The outlook for medium-term inflationary pressures depends on price-setting behaviour and the speed with which spare capacity in the economy is absorbed. Recent elevated inflation is expected to continue to impact price setting, keeping inflation more persistent than otherwise.

Hayley Gourley, Karen Silk, Prasanna Gai and Anna Breman saw upside risks to inflation relative to the central projection. These members observed that more persistence in energy and petrochemical prices could raise near-term inflation risks, impact price-setting behaviour, and lead to more sticky inflation over the medium term. Price-setting can be a front-loaded process, meaning businesses could raise domestic prices more than import costs warrant.

They also noted that high administered price inflation could continue. These factors increase the risk that monetary policy needs to lean against broader inflation pressures.

Paul Conway and Carl Hansen saw risks to inflation as balanced. These members shared concerns that high inflation could become embedded through price-setting behaviour. But weighed against this, they saw activity risks as skewed to the downside and noted that these could weigh on inflation. They highlighted the potential effects of weak house prices and precautionary behaviour, weakening growth in household spending.

All members agreed that downside risks to activity were significant and that the recovery could remain uneven. They also noted growth in activity may not flow through into additional employment as expected, particularly if businesses are relatively more focused on efficiency and technology investment in the short run.

Gradually removing monetary stimulus remains appropriate

The Committee discussed the monetary conditions required to return inflation sustainably to the 2 percent target mid-point.

When considering the policy response at this meeting, there was a clear consensus across the Committee. All members agreed that gradually removing monetary stimulus is consistent with achieving the medium-term inflation target, conditional on the outlook.

Members reflected on the potential trade-offs associated with a faster or slower monetary policy response. The Committee judged that its response balances containing inflationary pressures against the risk of holding the OCR and then having to raise it faster and to a higher level later.

All members agreed that the central projection for the OCR is appropriate. Conditional on the central economic outlook, members judged that the OCR may need to increase further. The Committee assessed that its monetary policy stance would guard against the effects of the oil price shock leading to persistently elevated price-setting behaviour, while supporting growth and employment.

However, the future OCR path is not pre-determined. The Committee’s response to data is not mechanical, as it depends on its assessment of various factors that impact inflation. Currently, indicators of medium-term inflation are consistent with inflation returning to target.

The Committee decided by consensus to increase the OCR by 25 basis points to 2.75 percent

The Committee judged that increasing the OCR to 2.75 percent is appropriate to sustainably return inflation to the 2 percent target mid-point while avoiding unnecessary instability in output, employment, interest rates and the exchange rate.

Future policy will depend on the Committee’s judgement of the balance of risks to medium-term inflation. This approach allows the Committee to observe and assess the effects of reduced monetary stimulus.

On Wednesday 2 September, the Committee decided by consensus to increase the OCR by 25 basis points to 2.75 percent.

Attendees:

MPC members: Anna Breman (chairperson), Carl Hansen, Hayley Gourley, Karen Silk, Paul Conway, Prasanna Gai

Treasury Observer: Struan Little

MPC Secretary: Liz Kendall

Official release

Source: Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi

• PSA re-elects President Virgil Iraia for second term

Labour leader Chris Hipkins backed the PSA’s call for a public good test applying before any public service restructures, in his speech to the union’s biennial Congress today.

In his speech Hipkins said Labour would commit to the PSA’s Public Good test.

“Yesterday you called for a national interest test before restructures. I can confirm that a Labour government will do that,” he said.

“There will be no restructure or cost cutting unless we understand the consequences of every decision,” he said.

PSA National Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons welcomed Labour’s endorsement of the public good test.

“Thousands of dedicated public servants have lost their jobs and the services New Zealanders rely on have been savaged, all in this blind rush to cut costs with no real plan for what would be lost.”

“That’s why we need a public good test. Agencies should have to stop and properly weigh up the impact on services, on workers and on the communities who rely on them, before ploughing ahead with a restructure, not after the damage is done,” (see summary of criteria below).

“When restructures are rushed through as this government has done without any real assessment of the impact, it’s the public who ultimately pay the price.

The PSA asked all parties likely to be in parliament after November’s election to address its biennial Congress. All except NZ First and ACT agreed.

In their speeches Te Pāti Māori Co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, Green Party Co-leader Marama Davidson and Opportunity Party candidate Jessica Hammond, along with Hipkins all committed to reinstating Pay Equity.

Hipkins promised a Labour Government would prioritise pay equity settlements for care and support workers and would update the Holidays Act in a way that meant workers would not lose holidays or leave.

Public Service Minister Paul Goldsmith addressed the Congress yesterday.

President re-elected

Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi President Virgil Iraia was re-elected for a second two-year term at the union’s Congress today.

Iraia (Ngāti Kahu, Ngāti Whātua, Ngāi Tūhoe, Ngāti Kahungunu) works as a Technical Support Analyst at Te Whatu Ora, Health New Zealand. He has also served as PSA Vice President and Teina of Te Rūnanga o Ngā Toa Āwhina.

Iraia said he was humbled to be re-elected by his fellow delegates.

“The clear message from delegates at Congress is that we need to keep campaigning for a change of government. We have a lot of work to do all the way up to the November 7 election and beyond to ensure we protect the jobs and rights of working New Zealanders.”

Background: the proposed public good test

The PSA proposes a statutory requirement for public sector agencies and other publicly funded employers to assess any significant restructure against a public good test before proceeding. The assessment would need to cover a range of criteria including:

• Impact on the services the agency delivers to the public
• Compliance with Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the agency’s ability to meet its obligations to Māori under Te Tiriti
• Impacts on workforce capability, both within the agency and across the public and community sectors
• Health and safety impacts, both physical safety and the impact of workload stress on remaining staff
• Long-term, intergenerational impacts, including impacts on New Zealand’s ability to mitigate and adapt to climate change
• Impacts on population groups at risk of being disadvantaged in their access to public and community services, including women, Māori, Pasefika, migrants, rainbow communities and disabled people
• Consistency with undertakings made by the Government in response to a Royal Commission of Inquiry or Auditor-General recommendations

The PSA says the test should apply to core public service agencies under the Public Service Act 2020 and be extended to local government and publicly funded community services as a condition of public funding.

The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is Aotearoa New Zealand's largest trade union, representing and supporting more than 95,000 workers across central government, state-owned enterprises, local councils, health boards and community groups.

Source: Greenpeace Aotearoa

News that the United States and New Zealand will co-fund a strategic port in the Cook Islands is being labelled a gross act of colonialism and resource grabbing by Greenpeace Aotearoa, who say it's part of the US agenda to start deep sea mining in the Pacific – despite huge resistance within the Cook Islands and across the Pacific.

The announcement, made at the Pacific Islands Forum Leaders’ Meeting (PIFLM) in Palau, will see the US contribute $50 million and NZ $10 million to build a new port at Tongareva atoll (Penrhyn), a former US military base.

The US Deputy State Secretary Christopher Landau, who is also attending PIFLM has said the “investment” builds on the Critical Minerals Framework that the Cook Islands and US signed earlier this year.

Penrhyn Basin contains a large density of high grade polymetallic nodules, which would-be deep sea miners are pushing to exploit. The US research vessel Okeanos Explorer has just been exploring this basin over July and August.

Juressa Lee, spokesperson for Greenpeace Aotearoa, says it’s disappointing to see NZ is complicit in this US plan which is clearly part of its bid to expedite unilateral mining permits to mine in international waters, and establish a strategic position.

“I don’t know why a meeting of Pacific Leaders feels like an appropriate time and place to progress the United States’ war machine, let alone the presence of the US itself. This meeting is for our leaders to assert sovereignty, honour what it means to be Pacific, and build regional consensus on matters that are uniquely ours, with our Pacific values at the centre”, says Lee.

“The Trump Administration isn’t about supporting Pacific sovereignty – they’ve been very clear about their priorities, and end game. A government that is pushing unilateral mining of the deep sea to fuel the US war machine has no comprehension of decision-making driven by our values and agreed by consensus.

“We know deep sea mining will harm the ocean we all rely on, and we know the minerals that would be dredged up are not going to any “green transition”, they will be war minerals that serve US interests.

“We have been watching the US government wage war across the globe for too long. I’m confused why Winston Peters and Mark Brown think this is a moment to be proud of, considering the Pacific nuclear-free legacy.

“We fought against US imperialism, and established the Treaty of Rarotonga declaring the region a nuclear-free zone. This treaty was an exercise of our cooperation, values and sovereignty – all of which the US dismisses by still refusing to ratify.

“I am here in Palau observing leaders from across Te Moana-Nui-a-Kiwa demonstrate Pacific values and priorities around climate responsiveness and ocean health. Many of these nations, bar a few outliers, are calling for a pause on deep sea mining. But the US is here hijacking this space to force deep sea mining – for their own interests – onto us, risking our homes and livelihoods.

“They have no right, and our leaders must call out this overstep, and stand firm in their own authority, and put the Pacific first.”

Greenpeace, alongside many allies, is campaigning to stop deep sea mining, an emerging industry where minerals from the deep seabed would be extracted using untested technology and putting deep sea life, and ocean health at risk.

Lee says New Zealand’s involvement in the port at Tongareva reveals where the Luxon Government stands with regards to its own war minerals deal in negotiations with the US. If it goes ahead despite the overwhelming opposition from iwi, communities and experts, the NZ government would also be putting foreign interests ahead of the health of the people and the environment in Aotearoa.

“The Pacific is not a playground for the US. Deep sea mining, if allowed to go ahead, will put the ocean and Pacific Peoples way of life at risk. The movement against this new extractive industry is strong and growing. We’ve won fights like this before, including winning a Nuclear-Free Pacific. It’s time for leaders around the world to say no to deep sea mining”, says Lee.