Banking Sector – The Co-operative Bank hits $25m milestone in customer profit-sharing

Source: The Co-operative Bank

The Co-operative Bank has returned $25 million to its customers since introducing profit-sharing in 2013, reaching the milestone with this year’s rebate, paid today.
New Zealanders are questioning where bank profits go, and whether customers are getting their fair share.
The Co-operative Bank is the only bank in New Zealand that shares profits directly with eligible customers through rebates, reflecting its 100% customer-owned model. Rather than distributing profits to external shareholders, the bank reinvests what it needs to grow and improve services, and returns the remainder to customers.
In addition to this year’s $1.2 million rebate, many of its customers have also benefited from account fee reductions and removals introduced over the past year, delivering around $2.3 million in annual savings from those changes, alongside continued improvements in digital tools and simpler products that make everyday banking easier.
Chief Executive Mark Wilkshire says the milestone highlights a fundamental difference.
“Reaching $25 million returned to customers is something we are proud of. It reflects how a co-operative model can work and what banking can look like. Our customers are our owners, and when we do well, they do well,” says Wilkshire.
“For us, that is what a fair share can look like in practice, returning value to the people who bank with us,” he says.
The 2026 Consumer NZ Banking survey reported 43% of customers think bank profits are unacceptable. The Co-operative Bank says its model offers a clear alternative: reinvest in the co-operative, then return the balance to customers.
The bank retained the market’s number one Net Promoter Score over the past year, with customers citing fairness, great service and being treated as more than just a number.
The Co-operative Bank serves approximately 180,000 customers across New Zealand.

Education Trends – ERO finds the number of students leaving mainstream schooling is rapidly increasing; calls for urgent reform

Source: Education Review Office

The Education Review Office (ERO) has found that the number of students leaving mainstream schooling to learn in alternative settings has doubled over the past last decade.
ERO recommends major changes to keep them in school – and a new model for those who leave.
ERO Senior Manager Rebecca Bjarnesen says more than 8,000 12 to 16-year-olds are now learning in alternative settings – twice as many as ten years ago.
Many schools work hard to support students to stay in mainstream education. Schools that are most effective at retaining students build strong relationships, provide tailored support and create a sense of belonging to the school. But some schools are much more likely to refer students to alternative settings. About 60 percent of referrals come from just 12 percent of schools.
Students who aren’t in mainstream schools often get their education in alternative settings like Activity Centres, Alternative Education or the Engagement and Wellbeing gateway at Te Aho o Te Kura Pounamu (Te Kura). ERO research has found these young people too often receive a limited education, leading to poor outcomes that can last through their lives.
“We found that students in these alternative settings make less progress than students in mainstream schools and four in five leave without any NCEA qualifications,” Ms Bjarnesen said.
ERO found that:
– students typically lose three months of learning while waiting to access an alternative setting. Fewer than one in six students return to mainstream school.
– not all students are taught by a qualified teachers – for example fewer than half of the teachers in Alternative Education have a teaching degree.
– students’ opportunities are limited by too few subjects and lack of access to formal qualifications. Almost half of students say there is no clear pathway for them when they leave alternative settings.
– worse education leads to worse lifetime outcomes for these students. Compared to similarly disadvantaged students, they are more likely to rely on benefits and more likely to enter the criminal justice system.
“We are failing the students who most need a quality education and missing an opportunity to change the lives of these young people. A step change is needed to reverse the trend of students disengaging from school,” Ms Bjarnesen says.
ERO is calling for urgent reform to strengthen mainstream schooling, so more students are supported to stay and succeed. ERO is also calling to put in place a new model of quality alternative provision so that all students in New Zealand receive a high-quality education, no matter where they study.
Notes
–  Bridging the gap: How well do we support students learning in alternative settings? can be found on the ERO’s Evidence website: https://www.evidence.ero.govt.nz/documents/bridging-the-gap-how-well-do-we-support-students-learning-in-alternative-settings-main-report
– ERO has also published insights for school leaders and school boards – these are available at https://www.evidence.ero.govt.nz/.
– ERO is the New Zealand Government’s external evaluation agency for the education system.

Ombudsman survey participants raise job losses, bullying and harassment after blowing the whistle on serious wrongdoing at work

Source: Office of the Ombudsman

New research released on World Whistleblower Day shows that around a third of people who blew the whistle on serious wrongdoing at their workplace last year, claimed they lost their job as a result.
The Office of the Ombudsman’s annual nationwide survey by AK Research on people’s awareness and knowledge of the Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers) Act 2022, shows that of those who claimed to have made a protected disclosure, more than half felt they experienced retaliation.
Four out of ten claimed to have been bullied or harassed, 29 percent claimed they had lost their job and a fifth say they were demoted.
“Our own figures are supported by Australian research which shows that up to 94% of disclosers experience stress-related emotional problems,” says Chief Ombudsman John Allen.
“The survey also shows that confidentiality is a barrier to reporting with more than a quarter of respondents saying that their confidentiality wouldn’t be guaranteed if they made a disclosure and another three out of ten were unsure.
“This is a wakeup call. Some people clearly do not feel they are protected by the law and there may be issues with the practice and culture within organisations that are also proving to be a barrier.”
Fewer than half of those surveyed felt their job would be safe if they made a protected disclosure and nearly a third felt their job would not be safe.
Fear of losing their job and retaliation by other staff or manager was cited as the main reason for not feeling safe.
“Workers and the general public need more support and guidance as part of the post-disclosure protections that already exist,” Mr Allen says.
“Workplaces should also consider what support they can offer to those who experience retaliation.”
Mr Allen says it is important to address these issues because whistleblowing can make a real difference to individuals, organisations and wider society.
“I can’t stress enough the value of people speaking out. Disclosures can address concerns raised by individuals, but they can also address wider systemic issues that can affect all New Zealanders.
“A whistleblowing investigation can bring about significant systemic change.”
The survey also showed that 24 percent of people said they had witnessed serious wrongdoing at work, but of those only 37 percent made a protected disclosure. This is down from 2025, where half of people who witnessed serious wrongdoing made a disclosure.
“As well as employees being able to make disclosures to their workplaces, anyone can make a disclosure to us if they believe they have witnessed serious wrongdoing at work and want to report it.
“We can receive disclosures about public and private sector and Non- Government Organisation or NGO workplaces. While we can’t investigate private sector and NGO organisations, we can refer these disclosures on to the right place.”
In 2024/25, the Office of the Ombudsman received 287 protected disclosure matters and is expecting to receive more than 320 protected disclosures matters over 2025/26.
The sample size for the survey was n=1018, with the margin of error for a 50% figure at the 95% confidence level being ± 3.1%.
The 2026 survey was conducted from 13 to 27 April 2026.
Key resources
For employers and appropriate authorities:
For disclosers:

Kaupapa Māori parenting programme strengthens kaimahi practice

Source: Rata Foundation

A kaupapa grounded in the parenting traditions of tūpuna Māori is equipping kaimahi with the skills and resources to better support whānau through mātauranga Māori.
Ngākau Aroha for Kaimahi, developed by Tūpuna Parenting, is one of the only kaupapa Māori professional development programmes about parenting offered in Aotearoa. The most recent cohort completed the 15-week course, which included a two-day noho marae at Te Āwhina Marae in Motueka.
Founder Elizabeth (Liz) Harte (Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Porou) says Tūpuna Parenting is focused on sharing this mātauranga through wānanga and professional development. “Tūpuna Parenting is a kaupapa about sharing the gentle and respectful parenting ways of tūpuna Māori with whānau across the motu. Our vision is to empower whānau with mātauranga to raise pepi and tamariki who are happy, loved and strong, and we do that in many ways.”
The organisation was started by Liz and her mother Helen Mountain Harte, a lead researcher in this field, in 2018. Following Helen's passing in 2019, Liz carried the work forward, shifting to online professional development during the COVID-19 pandemic before piloting the Ngākau Aroha for Kaimahi programme in 2021.
Liz says the programme is designed to support both kaimahi and whānau directly. “The first half of our Ngākau Aroha for Kaimahi professional development journey is about sharing the mātauranga with kaimahi through whakataukī, pūrākau, oral histories and early explorer accounts, so they can bring that on board and relate it to their own whānau and whakapapa. The second half of the journey is much more practical and outward-facing, focusing on how they weave this into their mahi every day, share it with the whānau they support and create meaningful change for those whānau who are interested.”
A Social Return on Investment (SROI) report for Ngākau Aroha for Kaimahi, completed in August 2025, shows that for every $1 invested, $11.20 of value is created for kaimahi, their own whānau, and the whānau they support. Liz says this independent evaluation has been an important part of their journey.
“Through that evaluation, we know that the kaimahi who come on this journey connect strongly with the kaupapa. They get a lot out of it in terms of cultural competency, confidence in their mahi and community engagement. As many of them are parents as well, they’ve seen increased confidence in their parenting and better mental wellbeing. There’s also a restoration of mana and better decision-making, and for their tamariki, their wellbeing and behaviour are seen to improve as well.”
Kandace Smiler (Ngāti Paoa, Te Ati Awa, Te Aitanga a Mahaki), a kaimahi who is participating in the programme, says the kaupapa offers whānau a complementary framework alongside other support services. “Whānau Māori appreciate a different take – they might already be engaged with counsellors and psychologists in a Western framework, but when we add the māoritanga layer, they are able to reconnect and feel more settled in their wairua. There’s a lot of depth in the mātauranga, and I found it helpful to have a very clear framework. I’m now able to utilise the resources that sit within Tūpuna Parenting.”
Tania Matautia (Te Arawa, Ngāti Uenukukopako, Te Roro o te Rangi), a graduate of the programme who is now a leader in the kaupapa, says it’s particularly relevant for supporting young parents. “Tūpuna Parenting is really based on acknowledging and supporting the tapu and mana of children. It can be quite difficult for young parents, but they are able to resonate with the kōrero that we share. Using tikanga Māori concepts helps them to connect and learn in ways that support them in their parenting.”
Rātā Foundation has supported Tūpuna Parenting since 2022, initially funding Canterbury, Nelson and Marlborough-based kaimahi to take part in the programme. This support has been extended to include rollout of an eight-week whānau wānanga programme, bringing the kaupapa directly to whānau.
– ends – About Rātā Foundation The South Island's most significant community investment fund, Rātā manages a pūtea (fund) of around $730 million [1] , enabling an investment of around $25 million per annum into its funding regions of Canterbury, Nelson/Tasman, Marlborough and the Chatham Islands. Since its inception in 1988, Rātā has invested over $630 million through community investment programmes to empower people to thrive. [1] Our investment balance reflects a specific point in time and may fluctuate due to market conditions and other external factors beyond our control.

FRESH INVESTMENT IN LOCAL TECH SECTOR FOR NZ SUPER FUND

Source: New Zealand Super Fund

The decade-long partnership between the New Zealand Superannuation Fund and leading local technology investor Movac continues, with the Super Fund committing $35 million to Movac’s Growth Fund 7 (MGF7).

The Super Fund is one of several institutional investors to back MGF7, which has raised $185 million at first close, almost double its initial target, and expects to hit its $200m fund cap next month.

Mark Vivian, Partner at Movac, said that strong support demonstrated investor confidence in Movac’s disciplined investment approach and strong track record, and reflected the considerable opportunities presented by New Zealand’s maturing technology sector.

Rishab Sethi, Acting Director of Private Equity at the Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation, manager of the $93 billion Super Fund, said the Super Fund had been the largest investor in several of Movac’s previous funds and the two organisations had built a close and highly effective working relationship.

“We're always looking for commercially attractive opportunities to invest in New Zealand,” said Sethi.

“For the past 10 years, Movac's growth funds have given us a way to support local companies when they need that support the most, to contribute to New Zealand's burgeoning tech sector, and to generate positive returns for the Super Fund. We're very pleased to further develop our partnership with them.”

The Super Fund has consistently maintained a strong bias towards its home market, with some 11 percent of its portfolio invested in New Zealand assets – including more than $500 million in private companies via external managers such as Movac.

Academy of NZ Lit responds to The Guardian Top 100

Source: Academy of New Zealand Literature

A reply to the Guardian’s “best ever”: the Southern Hemisphere Fiction 100
 
22 June 2026 – The Academy of New Zealand Literature has compiled the first-ever list of the top 100 works of fiction from the Southern Hemisphere. It is published today. Read the list here: https://www.anzliterature.com/feature/the-southern-hemisphere-fiction-100/
 
It was created as a response to a list of 100 novels published last month in the Guardiannewspaper, which they described as “the greatest literature ever published in English, as voted for by authors, critics and academics worldwide.” Only three writers from countries in the southern hemisphere were included in the Guardian’s list – two novels from the 1980s and one from the 1990s.
 
The Guardian’s list also excluded all but one of the Nobel literature laureates from the southern hemisphere, and many of the most important fiction writers in world literature – like Mario Vargas Llosa, Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, Nadine Gordimer, Roberto Bolaño and Janet Frame.
 
“How could a list of ‘the greatest literature ever published in English’ exclude so much of the world?” asks Paula Morris, founder of the Academy of New Zealand Literature. “This alternative Fiction 100 reminds us that where lists are made is important. I hope it encourages readers to new as well as familiar regions, countries, cultures and names.”
 
Almost 200 writers, critics, scholars, librarians, booksellers, editors and festival directors – most from the southern hemisphere – nominated books for the Southern Hemisphere Fiction 100. The ANZL included novels and short-story collections, and – like the Guardian– allowed books written in another language that are available in English translation.

Events – Wildlife Photographer of the Year opens Sunday 28 June at Auckland Museum

Source: Tāmaki Paenga Hira Auckland War Memorial Museum  

World-renowned Wildlife Photographer of the Year opens at Tāmaki Paenga Hira Auckland War Memorial Museum this Sunday, bringing 100 extraordinary nature photographs from across the globe to Tāmaki Makaurau.

On loan from the Natural History Museum, London, the exhibition opens to the public on Sunday 28 June, with an exclusive Members’ Preview on Saturday 27 June. (ref. https://www.aucklandmuseum.com/visit/exhibitions/wildlife-photographer-of-the-year-2026 )

Now in its 61st year, Wildlife Photographer of the Year is the most prestigious photography event of its kind, showcasing award-winning images that capture hidden animal behaviour, spectacular species and the breathtaking diversity of the natural world.

Auckland Museum Director of Audience Engagement Victoria Travers says the exhibition invites visitors to look more closely at the planet we share.

“It’s a privilege to bring Wildlife Photographer of the Year back to Auckland and share some of the most compelling photos taken of our natural world today. These images invite us to see both the beauty of our planet and the challenges it faces.”

Exhibition visitors will have the chance to enter the draw to win the ultimate expedition cruise for two, valued at over $20,000. In partnership with Lindblad Expeditions, one visitor will win an eight-day Alaska expedition for two with National Geographic-Lindblad Expeditions, travelling through the spectacular coastlines of Alaska and British Columbia.

Young photographers can also take inspiration from the exhibition through Nature Next Door: Photography Competition, open to students from Year 0–13. Tamariki and rangatahi are invited to photograph wildlife in their own backyard, local park or neighbourhood, with three entry categories and prize packs up for grabs.

During the July school holidays, families can enjoy Walk on the Wild Side: Gallery Encounters, with two larger-than-life wildlife enthusiasts roaming the Museum’s natural science galleries from Saturday 4 to Sunday 19 July, 10am–12pm and 1–3pm daily. Inspired by nature documentaries, these “Attenborough-in-training” characters will share funny, fascinating and surprising stories about the animals on display, encouraging kids to look closer at the natural world around them.

Wildlife Photographer of the Year is open at Auckland Museum from Sunday 28 June to Sunday 23 August 2026. Entry is included with Museum admission, which is free for Aucklanders. Museum Members can see the exhibition first at the Members’ Preview on Saturday 27 June, 9am–1pm.

Wildlife Photographer of the Year is developed and produced by the Natural History Museum, London, and supported by local exhibition partner Lindblad Expeditions.

Policy – Green’s tax policy will help level playing field for ordinary Kiwis, local businesses – Better Taxes

Source: Better Taxes for a Better Future

The Better Taxes for a Better Future campaign welcomes the Green Party's tax policy announcements released earlier today is an important step towards rebalancing New Zealand's tax system: to close the gaps in tax on big corporates; to tax wealth, not just hard work; and to generate the revenue we need to fund the things that matter.

“Right now, ordinary people and small to medium local business are paying their tax and contributing the most to funding essential public services, like schools, hospitals and transport infrastructure, while big corporates and the wealthiest people aren't paying their fair share,” said Kate Stone, Better Taxes campaign manager and spokesperson.

“In 2023 IRD research showed that the wealthiest families were paying less than half (9%) the tax rate of average Kiwis (20%), because while we tax every dollar workers' earn, we do not tax wealth properly in New Zealand. The Green's commitment to tax the super-rich 2.5% on net assets over $10m (excluding the family home), and to tax assets and gifts that people receive without working for them where they exceed $1m (excluding family farms and homes), are critical moves if we are going to tackle this unfairness and the inequality it perpetuates. We believe that pairing these policies with a comprehensive Capital Gains Tax would be even better!”

The Better Taxes Campaign considers these policies, alongside the commitment to a $10,000 tax-free threshold and more progressive tax rates, have the potential both to address immediate cost of living pressures, and to tackle skyrocketing wealth inequality that was on full display in last week's Rich List.

“We're not anti-wealth or opposed to success. But it's a question of balance. Over the last 40 years the wealth of the super rich in NZ has increased from $5.3b to $126bn, while child poverty rates have tripled. It is clear that the “success” of the wealthiest few is not lifting up everyone in Aotearoa, and we need to make significant changes now, if we're to avoid even greater inequality and the breakdown of social cohesion and democracy that come with it, as we're seeing globally.”

“Better Taxes also welcomes the moves to close some of the gaps in taxes on big corporates, to level the playing field for local small and medium businesses and to ensure the biggest corporations are contributing back into our economy, from which they're extracting huge profits,” said Stone.

Last year, alongside Tax Justice Aotearoa, we released the Big Tech Little Tax report which  demonstrated that some of the biggest tech companies were making billions of dollars in New Zealand and paying barely any tax. Last week we released expanded and updated research, which estimated tax minimisation practices by Big Tech have conservatively cost over $600m in the last five years.

“Our analysis shows these companies already have obligations under existing law to pay withholding taxes of at least 5% on much of the funds that they send to their parent company overseas and it is great to see the Green Party commit to cracking down on Big Tech,” said Stone.

“Finally, it's a no brainer to introduce a bank levy on the big four banks. Our recent polling showed there is majority support for such a levy, including amongst voters who support the current government. It was clear during Budget announcements that the Minister of Finance had been keen to advance such a levy, so we hope that there can be cross-party support for this measure that has already been adopted in Australia, the UK and some other EU countries.”

“If the big four try to pass the levy on to their customers then smaller banks will be given an opportunity to compete and people can vote with their feet. We would also recommend an excess profits tax on the big banks, which the UK has adopted, to create a disincentive for the major Australian-owned banks to take Kiwis for a ride, ” said Stone.

You can read the full Better Taxes and Tax Justice Aotearoa policy platform here: https://www.bettertaxes.nz/tax_policy_statement?utm_campaign=greens_tax_policy_2026&utm_medium=email&utm_source=tja

The Better Taxes for a Better Future Campaign is a coalition of over 20 organisations led by Tax Justice Aotearoa.

University Research – Groundbreaking study on zinc for autism – UoA

Source: University of Auckland (UoA)

What if a zinc supplement could help reduce the severity of autism symptoms?

A world-first study is underway at the University of Auckland, testing the effects of zinc on human brain cells grown in the lab.

Auckland Medical Research Foundation granted almost $145,500 to Physiology Professor Johanna Montgomery, who is leading the research at the University’s Centre for Brain Research, with support from PhD student Zoe Payne, Professor James Ellis from the University of Toronto, and Dr Kevin Lee from the University of California in San Francisco.

Montgomery has spent the past 15 years looking at links between autism and SHANK genes.

These genes are vital for brain cell communication, but some people with autism are born with missing or altered SHANK genes.

For the past 10 years, Montgomery’s team has been looking at the impacts of zinc on SHANK and other genes in the brains of mice.

That research demonstrated that giving zinc to pregnant and lactating mice helps prevent their offspring from showing autistic behaviours, such as anxiety, deficits in social interactions, and repetitive behaviours.

Earlier research by Montgomery’s team showed giving zinc to young mice reversed some symptoms of autism.

“Zinc clearly has an effect during the brain-wiring period when the foetus is developing, but perhaps more importantly it had beneficial effects when supplementation was given after the mice were weaned,” she says.

In some mice, autistic behaviours completely disappeared with zinc treatment, while other mice displayed reduced severity of symptoms, she says.

Montgomery warns it’s too early for people with autism to start taking zinc, which can cause harmful effects at the wrong dosage.

Autism can be caused by numerous factors and not all are associated with the gene variants targeted in the research with mice.

“We don’t yet know the effect of zinc on humans with autism – that’s why we’re carrying out this research on human brain cells.”

Over the years, Montgomery has reached out to families of people with Phelan-McDermid syndrome, a developmental disorder that typically includes autism, severely impaired learning, speech difficulties, gastrointestinal disorders, seizures, and low muscle tone.

The research team has now partnered with those families and will take blood samples from about five people with Phelan-McDermid syndrome, which is caused by the SHANK 3 gene being partially or completely deleted.

The University of Toronto has sent cell samples from people with SHANK 2 gene variants, which are also associated with severe autism, to be used in the experiments.

The blood cells will be “trained” and multiplied in incubators in the lab to become thousands of brain cells, which the scientists can use to research the impacts of zinc.

Electrodes will test how well signals travel between brain cells, before and after the cells receive a dose of zinc.

“We predict there are altered connections between brain cells in people with Phelan-McDermid syndrome and autism.

“Our mouse models showed zinc strengthens communication between brain cells, so we want to see if this is also the case in human brain cells.”

Montgomery is working with a clinical nutritionist, paediatric neurologist and neuropsychologist to design a pilot clinical trial to examine the effects of zinc supplementation on people with Phelan McDermid syndrome.

If funding can be found, the pilot clinical trial will start by exploring the impacts of zinc on the social behaviours and cognitive abilities of people with Phelan McDermid Syndrome, then broaden to include people with severe autism.

Almost one percent of the population in New Zealand is diagnosed with autism, but there is currently no drug treatment available specifically for autism or Phelan-McDermid syndrome, she says.

For some people, autism spectrum disorder is a mild condition that requires no treatment, but for others it causes severe disabilities.

Many children with SHANK gene variants have intellectual disabilities and many parents have to leave work to care for their children full-time, Montgomery says.

“I would love it if this research eventually helps families to experience improvement in their children with Phelan-McDermid syndrome.

“I remember one of the parents saying, ‘I wish one day I could hear my child say Mum’.

“It’s heartbreaking that they haven't had that experience and it would be amazing to find a way to help.”

Previous funding from Auckland Medical Research Foundation and grants from the Health Research Council, Marsden Fund, and Neurological Foundation have paved the way for the current research.

Federated Farmers – Plan Change 1 threatens Waikato farming future

Source: Federated Farmers

Federated Farmers is calling on the Government to urgently press pause on a controversial Waikato plan change until the dust has settled on major national policy reforms.
“This will be the most significant rule change ever seen by farmers in the Waikato and Waipā catchments,” says Waikato Federated Farmers president Chris Woolerton.
“There are huge restrictions and compliance requirements being placed on Waikato farmers that will totally change the nature of farming in the region.
“Plan Change 1 will add cost, complexity and duplication, with thousands of farmers needing both a resource consent and a gold-plated farm plan just to keep farming.”
Woolerton, a Taupiri dairy farmer, wants to see the plan change paused until there’s clarity on resource management, local government and farm plan reforms.
“These new farming rules are completely at odds with the Government’s direction of travel and vision for the country,” he says.
“On one hand we have a Government saying it wants to cut the cost and complexity from farming by overhauling local government and the RMA.
“But on the other hand we’ve got a binding court decision pushing in the opposite direction, bringing in very prescriptive farming rules with huge compliance requirements.”
The process to develop PC1 began in 2012 and has been tied up in endless submissions, hearings, and appeals ever since.
The Environment Court finally released its decision on 8 June, giving Waikato Regional Council until 21 July to make 20 specific changes before the plan will be finalised.
Woolerton says a big part of the issue is the length of time taken by the Environment Court to make a final decision.
“These rules took so long to work their way through the court system that by the time they landed they were already out of date and out of step with central government.
“This process has taken more than 14 years and, in that time, we’ve seen significant changes in farmers’ environmental practices. Farmers have moved quicker than the RMA process has.”
He says the decision has landed smack bang in the middle of reforms of the resource management system, local government and freshwater rules.
“That’ll create massive confusion for farmers, certifiers and the council alike, while trying to comply with what feel like ever-changing rules.
“That’s why we’re calling for central government to step in and put these rules on ice until the new system is clarified.
“Why roll out new farming rules that are about to be replaced? When the RMA goes, PC1 will go with it.”
Once in force, Plan Change 1 will introduce sweeping new rules for agricultural land use, affecting more than 4,500 farms across the Waikato and Waipā River catchments.
For example, restrictive rules will make it extremely difficult for farmers to change land use or even switch between different farming systems.
This would hit many Waikato farmers who converted their dairy farms to dairy goats in the 2010s, leaving them unable to return to milking cows.
More than 400 farmers in the Whangamarino Wetland Catchment will also have to obtain a restricted discretionary resource consent simply to continue their existing farming activities.
Those farmers will have no certainty they can keep farming, and those who do secure consent could be subjected to significant restrictions on how they operate.
King Country sheep and beef farmer Reon Verry, who serves as Waikato Federated Farmers meat and wool chair, is also concerned about what PC1 might mean for local farmers.
Verry is a strong supporter of environmental protection, having completed substantial fencing and planting projects on his farm and helped establish a local catchment group.
“The environment is something I really care about, but these rules will simply see a whole lot of money wasted on compliance costs rather than on-farm action,” Verry says.
“With all the Government’s reforms currently underway, it makes total sense to press pause on implementing these new rules until everyone has more clarity.
“Pausing the new rules doesn’t mean pressing pause on environmental improvements. Farmers are still going to keep getting on with the good work we’re already doing.
“Like most farmers, I’ve still got my farm environment plan to get on with, the native trees are ordered, and the fencers are booked in.”
Verry says Ministers are currently working their way through what the new national system will look like, and we need to be careful to avoid duplication or confusion.
“Common sense would suggest we slow down and wait for the new system to land.”