Whiria Te Mahara New Zealand History Grants opens for applications

Source: Ministry for Culture and Heritage

“I am proud to announce that Whiria Te Mahara New Zealand History Grants is open for applications,” says Leauanae Laulu Mac Leauanae.
The grants support historians, researchers and writers who are working on non-fiction projects that will significantly enhance our understanding of New Zealand’s past.
“Like past years, we expect to award 8 to 12 projects funding up to $12,000 each for research and writing costs. Applications are open until the 15th of October 2025.
This year is the last year for the Whiria Te Mahara New Zealand History Grants. The grants were set up in 1989-90 and were established using Lotteries funding of $1 million as seed funding held in trust. “Since the start of the grants, interest rates have declined, and from the early 2000s the Ministry has accessed the funding principal to meet higher and growing demand.
“Investment interest rates have been historically low since 2008, and the interest earned has not been sufficient to meet the demand on the grants.
“Over the last 15 years, the original funding model has become unsustainable. Because alternative methods of funding the grants have not been identified, we have unfortunately now arrived at the end point for Whiria Te Mahara.
“It is fantastic to see the impact these grants have made over their lifetime. Since 1990 the fund has supported over 380 projects, distributing almost $3.7 million. The grants have supported some of New Zealand’s best-known historians and some of our most influential historical works on diverse topics.
“The grants have advanced research, resulted in publications, and had a place in career development of history talent throughout Aotearoa.”
Manatū Taonga will explore options to support Aotearoa New Zealand’s historical community following the conclusion of this fund.
“While it is sad that the grants are coming to an end, I am also excited to see the final projects awarded funding through Whiria Te Mahara.
“Start working on your application and send it in. This is your last opportunity to be part of Whiria Te Mahara New Zealand History Grants’ journey” says Leauanae.
For information about how to apply for Whiria Te Mahara New Zealand History Grants, visit our website: Whiria Te Mahara New Zealand History Grants

Farm News – Strong wool – where to next? – Federated Farmers

Source: Federated Farmers

Federated Farmers meat & wool chair Richard Dawkins joins other farming and wool industry leaders at strong wool workshops in Otago and Southland next week. Richard writes there’s reason for hope the strong wool industry has turned a corner – but farmers need to get in behind the change-makers.
My earliest memories of wool are of hot summer days after weaning, shearing our mixed-aged and two-tooth mid-micron Corriedale ewes.
The hum of the handpieces, my father and grandfather skirting fleeces at the table, and Marty – our long-time worker – stuffing them into the press.
In the early 1980s, wool contributed 65% of our farm’s sheep income. Wool was king, and sheep were a true dual-purpose animal.
Today, strong wool makes up just 1-2% of gross farm income. It’s become little more than an animal health treatment, rather than a value-adding enterprise.
The national sheep flock is now about one third of what it was at its peak in the 1980s – and our influence in global markets has similarly dwindled.
I don’t want to rehash old grievances, but to comprehend what’s next for us farmers and the wool industry, we must understand how we got here, and what we can improve on.
Synthetic fibres rose in the 1970s, capturing market share with low cost and convenience.
The collapse of the Reserve Price Scheme in 1991 removed the price floor, exposing growers to full competition with synthetics.
Prices fell – and kept falling – as industry failed to adapt. The traditional supply chain couldn’t deliver value to farmers, and relying on bulk commodity demand became folly.
Fragmentation remains one of our biggest weaknesses. From farm to consumer, wool is handled, blended, and traded repeatedly – margins are clipped at every stage, but little is reinvested in building demand or brand.
Most farmers have no idea where their wool

Fonterra lifts FY25 forecast Farmgate Milk Price and narrows FY26 range

Source: Fonterra
 
Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd has today increased the 2024/25 season forecast Farmgate Milk Price from $10.00 per kgMS to $10.15 per kgMS, with the range narrowing from $9.70 – $10.30 per kgMS to $10.10 – $10.20 per kgMS.
 
CEO Miles Hurrell says “as we close out the FY25 year, I’m pleased to be in the position to increase the forecast for the 2024/25 season by 15 cents.
 
“We began the season with a wide forecast range to account for potential volatility in commodity prices and exchange rates resulting from geopolitical dynamics.
 
“However, Global Dairy Trade prices have remained stable, and when coupled with our well contracted sales book, we have been able to increase our forecast Farmgate Milk Price across the season,” says Mr Hurrell.
 
Fonterra will confirm the final Farmgate Milk Price for the 2024/25 season alongside its FY25 annual results released in September.
 
Fonterra has also retained the $10.00 per kgMS forecast for the current 2025/26 season and narrowed the range from $8.00 – $11.00 per kgMS to $9.00 – $11.00 per kgMS.
 
“Global Dairy Trade prices continue to be strong, supporting the $10.00 per kgMS forecast midpoint for the current season.
 
“However, it’s still early in the season and the risk of volatility remains, which is reflected in the wide forecast range,” says Mr Hurrell.
 
The Co-op’s FY25 forecast earnings of 65-75 cents per share remain unchanged.

Results – Kiwibank announces FY25 results

Source: Kiwibank

FY25 financial highlights:

  • Net profit after tax of $191 million for the 12 months to 30 June 2025, down 5% on the prior financial year.
  • Strong balance sheet growth was offset by a lower Net Interest Margin in a challenging economic environment.
Above market lending and deposit growth as more Kiwi choose Kiwibank:

  • Lending growth of $3.3 billion, growing total lending by 10% to $35.8 billion.
  • Home lending grew $2.3 billion. This included helping 9,018 Kiwi get on the ladder and 5,752 Kiwi into homes with a better deal through refinancing.
  • Business lending grew by $1 billion.
  • Kiwibank’s deposit book grew 8% to $30.3 billion.

Chief Executive commentary:

Kiwibank Chief Executive Steve Jurkovich said:

“While conditions remained challenging across sectors, our strategy is about staying optimistic, consistently being open for business and supporting customers – not just in the good times, but especially in the tougher times. That’s exactly what we’ve done.

“In FY25, we delivered strong underlying growth in the highly competitive home lending and deposit markets. Business banking was a standout in a subdued market and a clear signal of our commitment to backing Kiwi businesses through uncertain times.

“At the same time, we continued building the Kiwibank of the future by investing to be more adaptable and customer focused. Over the past 12 months, we delivered key advancements including enhanced fraud protection, faster lending decisions for small businesses, and piloted our first product on a new core banking platform.

“We believe strongly in technology to deliver convenience for customers, but recognise that being face to face with your banker in moments that matter is still highly valued by customers. That is why we continue to have the largest physical banking network in the country with ongoing investment in our branch network, including moving into New Zealand’s busiest mall in Newmarket (Auckland) and committing to Northland with plans for a new Kerikeri branch and a refurbishment of Whangārei Central to deliver faster, more convenient service.”

FY25 non-financial highlights:

“In FY25, we reshaped our credit card offering to deliver greater value to more Kiwi, moving away from exclusive rewards and introducing benefits like enhanced travel insurance and features that reflect what customers value today.

“We also challenged the status quo with initiatives that unlock opportunity, including funding for entrepreneurs (StartUp+) and removing fees for standard open banking API requests. Kiwibank was among the first to roll out Confirmation of Payee, helping protect customers from fraud and scams.

“More Kiwi are choosing Kiwibank for fairness and trust. We climbed 10 places in the Kantar Corporate Reputation Index, now ranked 10th, and we are the only bank in the top 15 as we continue to live up to our Purpose of Kiwi making Kiwi better off.”

Capital to support Kiwibank’s growth:

“Over the past five years, Kiwibank has doubled its balance sheet, and we’re aiming to do it again. Cabinet’s approval for our parent company Kiwi Group Capital (KGC) to explore a capital raise of up to $500 million is designed to accelerate our growth and strengthen our competitive edge. But this is about more than scale, it’s about delivering better outcomes for all New Zealanders, whether they bank with us or not.”

Outlook:

Mr Jurkovich said the Reserve Bank's decision to cut the OCR this week is positive for homeowners and businesses. “It is a strong signal of further easing ahead, aimed at supporting households and businesses amid a slowing economy. While global and domestic challenges remain, this sets the stage for a more resilient and confident recovery.”

About Kiwibank

Kiwibank is a Purpose-led organisation that has modern, Kiwi values at heart and keeps Kiwi money where it belongs – right here in New Zealand. As a Kiwi bank, with more than a million customers, our trusted experts are focused on supporting Kiwi with their home ownership aspirations and backing local business ambitions, so together we can thrive here in Aotearoa and on the world stage. Kiwibank is the #1 bank in Kantar’s 2024 Corporate Reputation Index and the only bank in the top 15. To find out more about Kiwibank visit www.kiwibank.co.nz.

Legislation – Unions celebrate new pay transparency law

Source: NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi

The NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi is celebrating the passage of Labour MP Camilla Belich’s Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill into law. The Bill will protect working people who want to discuss or disclose their pay.

“This Bill represents a significant step towards pay transparency for workers. We are thrilled that is has been supported across the House and will now become law,” said NZCTU Secretary Melissa Ansell-Bridges.

“Illegal and unfair pay gaps are a huge problem in this country. This is in part because employers have imposed a culture of secrecy around pay. Often workers have had no way of finding out if they are being paid what they're worth.

“Pay secrecy has shielded unfair and unlawful practices that should be brought to light.

“Workers have a right to discuss their own pay rates with whoever they please. Their pay is their own business. Bosses should not be able to impose secrecy over personal information.

“Unions have been campaigning for pay transparency because it is a step towards a culture of openness in workplaces. It will help address persistent pay gaps.

“At a time when working people are facing relentless attacks, it’s great that we can take a moment to celebrate a win,” said Ansell-Bridges.

Economy – OCR cuts don’t appear to be over yet – Cotality

Source: Cotality – Kelvin Davidson, Chief Property Economist for Cotality NZ (formerly CoreLogic)

The Reserve Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee went ahead with a 0.25% official cash rate (OCR) cut today, as widely expected. This decision was pretty clearly signalled at the last meeting in early July, and the economic (weak) and inflation (rising but not critically) figures have evolved broadly as expected in the meantime.
The Committee also discussed a rate hold as well as a 0.5% cut, with the vote ending up 4-2 in favour of the 0.25% drop. This menu of options has a ‘downwards bias’ and pretty clearly suggests that they envisage further rate falls yet.
Indeed, the forecasts that came alongside the Monetary Policy Statement (MPS) showed GDP may not have bottomed out yet (possible -0.3% drop in Q2) and that the unemployment rate could still rise a little further. Inflation could go a bit higher, due to the tradeable/imported component, but spare capacity in the economy should mean this doesn’t last.
It seems fair to conclude from these projections that another one or even two OCR cuts lie ahead, with the first potentially delivered at the next MPS on 26th November. That will be the last meeting for the year and could be an opportunity to support households further over the holiday period, given that the first decision for 2026 doesn’t occur until late February. Note that the Reserve Bank’s own forecast track for the OCR has it reaching a trough of somewhere close to 2.5% by the middle of next year.
The housing market effects from today’s decision are likely to be small. If anything, the possibility of more falls in mortgage rates than previous thought could lift activity and house prices a bit. But those rate changes may be fairly minor. And in the meantime, as the RBNZ has indicated, the economic and labour market outlook is still disappointing – which will tend to weigh on housing, as it’s already doing.
Those concerns about job security might mean that many existing borrowers who are rolling off higher fixes from the past and down onto the new prevailing mortgage rates might choose to save their extra cash or reduce the term of their loan (by keeping repayments the same) rather than spend it in the economy or property market. All in all, the rest of 2025 for NZ’s housing market may be just as subdued as the first 7-8 months of the year.

Education – Ara connects with international partners at key events

Source: Ara Institute of Canterbury

Leaders in the international education sphere gathered at Ara Institute of Canterbury on Wednesday for a showcase of innovation, collaboration and cultural connection.
Hosted at Te Puna Wānaka, Ara’s wharenui, the event welcomed 35 key education and immigration from across the globe and offered a firsthand experience of Ara’s learning environment and its commitment to shaping future-ready graduates in Aotearoa.
“We’re absolutely thrilled to welcome our international partners to Ara,” said Deanna Anderson, Head of Marketing and Recruitment.
“This has been a chance to share our unique learning environment, continue building meaningful relationships, and show the world what makes Ara such a special place to study, grow and thrive.”
A similar event is planned for Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland next week. 
The largest campus-based vocational education provider nationally, Ara Institute of Canterbury is a key player in New Zealand’s tertiary education sector, offering programmes designed to meet the evolving demands of industry and society.
Located in Canterbury, in the heart of Te Waipounamu (South Island), the institute reflects the region’s reputation for resilience and innovation through its teaching and learning practices, and strong industry connections.
Programmes span a wide range of disciplines, including sustainable practice, digital design, construction management, creative industries and business leadership. The focus remains on practical, future-oriented learning delivered in a collaborative environment that supports both local and international students.
The agent event began with a mihi whakatau (Māori welcome) led by Stan Tawa, Kaiwhakahaere or Manager of Te Puna Wānaka, followed by a breakfast and networking session. Strategic updates were shared by Ara’s recently expanded international recruitment and admissions teams, offering insights into current initiatives and future plans.
An academic showcase followed, featuring highlights from key programme areas, with strong interest shown in Ara’s new portfolio of post-graduate applied management offerings.
Delegates also participated in an interactive workshop, designed to foster dialogue and collaboration.
The Auckland event on August 27 has a guest list of over 80 agents. To find out more reach out to Monique.Riddell@ara.ac.nz.
“We’re proud to share our vision, values, and vibrant campus life with our international partners. These events are testament to Ara’s commitment to global engagement and excellence in education,” Anderson added.
“Our door is open to any groups who would like to catch up with what Ara Institute of Canterbury has to offer.” 

Economy – OCR lowered to 3% – Reserve Bank of New Zealand

Source: Reserve Bank of New Zealand

OCR lowered to 3% – Monetary Policy Statement and the MPC’s record of meeting, which summarises the committee's discussions, leading to the decision.

Annual consumers price index inflation is currently around the top of the Monetary Policy Committee’s 1 to 3 percent target band. However, with spare capacity in the economy and declining domestic inflation pressure, headline inflation is expected to return to around the 2 percent target midpoint by mid-2026.

New Zealand’s economic recovery stalled in the second quarter of this year. Spending by households and businesses has been constrained by global economic policy uncertainty, falling employment, higher prices for some essentials, and declining house prices.

There are upside and downside risks to the economic outlook. Cautious behaviour by households and businesses could further dampen economic growth. Alternatively, the economic recovery could accelerate as the full effects of interest rate reductions flow through the economy.

The Monetary Policy Committee today voted to decrease the Official Cash Rate (OCR) by 25 basis points to 3 percent. Further data on the speed of New Zealand’s economic recovery will influence the future path of the OCR. If medium-term inflation pressures continue to ease as expected, there is scope to lower the OCR further.

Summary record of meeting – August 2025

Annual consumers price index inflation remains within the Monetary Policy Committee’s 1 to 3 percent target band. Recent increases in food prices and administered prices have contributed to near-term inflationary pressure. However, domestic activity has been subdued and there remains significant spare productive capacity in the economy. Headline inflation is expected to return to around the 2 percent target mid-point by mid-2026. If medium-term inflation pressures continue to ease as expected, there is scope to lower the OCR further.

Annual CPI inflation remains within the target band

Annual consumers price index (CPI) inflation increased to 2.7 percent in the June 2025 quarter. Headline inflation is expected to reach to 3.0 percent in the September 2025 quarter, reflecting large increases in administered prices, food prices, and the prices of other tradable goods and services.

Surveyed measures of medium-term inflation expectations remain near 2 percent, consistent with the mid-point of the target band. Non-tradables inflation has continued to decline in aggregate. Measures of core inflation have declined and are within the target band. Headline inflation is expected to converge to the mid-point of the target range over the next year as tradables inflation pressures dissipate and significant spare capacity continues to reduce domestic price pressures.

Near-term inflation expectations have increased, particularly for households. Household inflation expectations have risen across several advanced economies and may be influenced by global factors such as increased trade restrictions, as well as relatively large increases in some prices such as those for food and energy.

Tariffs and economic policy uncertainty are dampening the global economic outlook

Evidence to date suggests that the global economy is responding broadly as expected to trade restrictions and policy uncertainty. Growth in some of our trading partners, particularly China, was higher than expected in the second quarter of 2025 but is expected to moderate in the coming quarters. Headline inflation has increased moderately in some advanced economies but is declining in most of our Asian trading partners.

Tariffs are causing changes to global trading patterns but have so far had a limited effect on aggregate global trade volumes. To date, there is no evidence of major disruption to global supply chains, or a material impact on the prices of New Zealand’s imports or exports. The Committee noted that it continues to expect that the increase in global trade restrictions will result in less inflationary pressure in the New Zealand economy.

The effective tariff rate on New Zealand exports to the United States is higher than anticipated at the time of the May Statement. Some firms and industries may experience more challenging export conditions as a result. The medium-term implications for New Zealand will depend on how global demand responds to increased trade restrictions and economic policy uncertainty.  

Economic growth in New Zealand is expected to recover gradually

High-frequency indicators suggest that the New Zealand economy contracted in the second quarter of 2025 and was weaker than expected at the time of the May Statement. Growth is expected to resume in the September quarter, consistent with a recovery in some economic indicators for July. A key judgement for the Committee’s economic assessment was the extent to which spare capacity in the New Zealand economy is likely to persist.

The Committee discussed constraints on household wealth and discretionary income. Employment and hours worked have declined, and wage inflation has slowed sharply over the last year. Household dissaving since the start of 2022 has reduced savings buffers. At the same time, inflation in some essential expenditure components such as food, gas, electricity, and council rates has been much higher than the general rate of inflation. These factors were noted as likely to contribute to a slower recovery in domestic spending than would otherwise be the case.

House prices have declined to a level within the Reserve Bank’s range of sustainable house price estimates. Housing is a key component of household wealth, which influences household spending. Ongoing weakness in the housing market is contributing to subdued residential construction and household consumption.

The Committee discussed the fiscal outlook. Declining government spending as a share of the economy is expected to reduce inflationary pressure in the medium term. This is consistent with the economic and fiscal projections published in the Budget Economic and Fiscal Update 2025.

The Committee acknowledged regional and sectoral divergences in economic activity. House price growth has varied considerably across regions. High commodity export prices are supporting activity in the agricultural sector, resulting in stronger spending in rural areas. However, to date, many agricultural businesses have used higher export revenues to pay down debt, limiting the pass-through to consumption and investment.  

There is significant spare capacity in the New Zealand economy

A broad range of indicators suggest that significant spare capacity in the New Zealand economy persists. Unemployment has increased, as have measures of labour underutilisation, and firms are reporting that it is relatively easy to find labour. Firms are also reporting low levels of capacity utilisation. The Committee noted that while credit is generally available, growth in business lending has been slow.

The Committee discussed slow growth in the productive capacity of New Zealand’s economy. Potential output growth has slowed, reflecting subdued investment, low productivity growth, and historically low population growth through net immigration. The Committee noted that appropriate monetary policy settings would support sustainable long-run investment and growth.

Monetary policy continues to transmit through the financial system

The Committee noted that wholesale interest rates have fallen since the May Statement, resulting in lower mortgage and term deposit rates, particularly at shorter terms. The average interest rate on the stock of mortgages is expected to continue to decline over the coming year, as about half of existing mortgages are expected to re-fix onto lower rates over the next six months. This will reduce debt servicing costs for households as past reductions in the OCR continue to transmit through the financial system.

Long-term bond yields have increased internationally over the first half of the year, with higher term premia reflecting geoeconomic uncertainty and elevated debt levels. Despite subdued domestic activity, the New Zealand dollar TWI has been relatively stable through this period, in part due to policy developments and declining short-term interest rate expectations in the United States. Equity prices in the United States have been elevated, but this has largely been attributable to the out-performance of a few large technology firms.

The financial system remains stable

The Committee was briefed on financial system stability. Subdued demand and low profitability are contributing to financial stress for some businesses. Non-performing loans for households and businesses have increased but remain low relative to previous cycle peaks. Increased provisions and strong capital buffers mean that banks are well-prepared to absorb any losses. The Committee noted that monetary policy settings that support growth in the economy will also contribute to financial stability.

There are upside and downside risks to the economic outlook

The Committee expects headline inflation to remain within the target band over the forecast horizon. However, with inflation projected to increase to 3.0 percent in the September quarter, there is a material possibility that it rises above the target band. The period in which this is most likely to occur is too soon for monetary policy to have any meaningful effect. However, if inflation were to remain higher for longer than expected, there is a risk that this influences inflation expectations and wage- and price-setting behaviour over the medium term.

The Committee noted that increases in administered prices, such as local council rates and some energy charges, have contributed to higher-than-otherwise non-tradables inflation. Some members emphasised that these prices represent rising costs for businesses and may spill over to generalised non-tradables inflation, particularly in the near term. Other members emphasised spare capacity and weak demand, which would limit the ability of firms to pass on cost pressures to consumers.

Some members also drew attention to slow growth in parts of the economy that are most sensitive to interest rates. Residential construction, house prices, and retail activity have not materially recovered, despite monetary easing to date. On a quarterly basis, non-tradables inflation excluding central and local government charges is consistent with inflation at or below the target mid-point. Some members suggested that this may represent a downside risk to medium-term inflation. Other members emphasised that previous reductions in the OCR continue to transmit through the financial system and will take time to have their full effect on activity and inflation. Growth in interest-rate-sensitive sectors of the economy is projected to recover over the remainder of this year.

The Committee discussed the extent to which uncertainty associated with global trade restrictions is likely to limit domestic demand and inflationary pressure in the medium term. Consumption and investment demand appear to have weakened in the second quarter of 2025, partly in response to heightened trade policy uncertainty. The effects of uncertainty on domestic activity are assumed to persist over the remainder of the year. Some members emphasised the fact that some measures of uncertainty have improved considerably since May and noted a possibility that the domestic economy recovers more rapidly as the effects of uncertainty dissipate. Other members highlighted that excess supply in China and some parts of emerging Asia has the potential to lower tradable inflation in New Zealand over the medium term.  

Some members also emphasised the risk that precautionary behaviour by New Zealand households and businesses may result in a weaker consumption and investment outlook than assumed, particularly in the context of slow growth in household wealth and discretionary incomes and low firm profitability. In this environment, businesses that are uncertain about potential future demand are less willing to invest, which in turn lowers potential growth and could further prolong uncertainty about future incomes and wealth. It is possible that pessimistic sentiment, together with the initial negative effects of the global tariff shock, have dampened the effects of the reduction in the OCR since last August.

The Committee noted limits to the ability of monetary policy to influence expectations of long-term growth. Some members emphasised that near-term support from monetary policy is most effective when combined with regulatory and policy settings that promote innovation and investment to support productivity growth.  

The Committee voted to reduce the OCR to 3 percent

The projected path of the OCR reflects the Committee’s central expectation of the path needed to ensure that inflation settles sustainably near the target mid-point. Uncertainty about the future path of the OCR is reflected in the Committee’s discussion of upside and downside risks to the outlook. Some members considered the balance of risk to be to the upside relative to the projected path, while others considered the balance of risk to be to the downside.

The Committee discussed three policy options: keeping the OCR on hold at 3.25 percent; cutting the OCR by 25 basis points to 3 percent; or cutting by 50 basis points to 2.75 percent.

The case for holding the OCR steady at 3.25 percent focused on positive influences on growth. Global economic activity outside of the United States has so far proven resilient in the face of new trade barriers, and global policy uncertainty has reduced from its peaks in April and May. The full extent of recent monetary easing is yet to fully transmit through the economy. Although high-frequency indicators suggest weak economic activity in the June 2025 quarter, available indicators for July suggest some improvement. With inflation approaching the top of the target band, and near-term inflation expectations rising, it could be prudent to pause to observe incoming data. One member gave relatively more weight to this view.

The case for lowering the OCR by 50 basis points to 2.75 percent emphasised declining inflationary pressure and significant spare capacity. Some members put relatively more weight on the risk that the negative consequences of global policy uncertainty on domestic consumption and investment are self-reinforcing and therefore more persistent. A larger reduction in the OCR might disrupt such a dynamic and generate clearer signals that support consumption and investment, whereas a gradual reduction in the OCR might not provide the same positive signalling effect. These members also emphasised that weakness in the labour market and excess capacity limits the upside risk to inflation should the economy recover more quickly than projected.

The case for lowering the OCR by 25 basis points to 3 percent was based on the upside and downside risks around the central projection being broadly balanced. Financial conditions are continuing to respond to past reductions in the OCR. They are also influenced by expectations of the future path of the OCR, which provides sufficient signalling effects. If medium-term inflation pressures continue to ease in line with the Committee’s central projection, the Committee expects to lower the OCR further. Reducing the OCR by 25 basis points at this meeting provides the opportunity to adjust this view incrementally in response to new information.

On Wednesday 20 August, the Committee voted on the options of either reducing the OCR by 25 basis points or reducing the OCR by 50 basis points. By a majority of 4 votes to 2, the Committee agreed to decrease the OCR by 25 basis points to 3 percent.  

Attendees:
MPC members: Christian Hawkesby (Chair), Bob Buckle, Paul Conway, Prasanna Gai, Carl Hansen, Karen Silk
Treasury Observer: James Beard
MPC Secretary: Evelyn Truong.

Forestry Sector – Why carbon forestry rules won’t work – Federated Farmers

Source: Federated Farmers

Federated Farmers says the Government’s proposed rules to limit whole-farm conversions to carbon forestry are far too weak to stop the damage being done to rural New Zealand.
“The draft rules have completely missed the mark,” says Federated Farmers forestry spokesperson Richard Dawkins.
“As they’re currently drafted, the proposed regulations will barely make a dent in the number of whole-farm conversions to carbon forestry.
“Unless Minister Todd McClay steps in and makes urgent changes, we’ll continue to see our productive hill country swallowed up by permanent pine forests at an alarming rate.”
The Government’s proposal is to cap the amount of farmland that can be registered in the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) at 25%.
But that limit applies only to land use capability (LUC) classes 1 to 5 – the land least likely to be targeted for carbon farming in the first place.
“The reality is that only 12% of recent carbon farm conversions have happened on this kind of land anyway,” Dawkins explains.
“The remaining 88% have occurred on class 6 and 7 land, which is where most of New Zealand’s sheep and beef farmers also happen to operate.
“These are not marginal blocks of scrub or waste. They’re productive, resilient hill country farms – the backbone of our red meat industry and a vital part of our food production system.
“Under the new rules, those farms will get next to no protection.”
The Government is instead proposing a 15,000-hectare annual cap for class 6 land and leaving class 7 unrestricted – a move Dawkins calls ineffective and unfair.
“There’s just too much sheep and beef land without protection for it to be effective,” Dawkins says.
“It will be business as usual for the big polluters and foreign investors looking to blanket rural New Zealand in pine trees.
“This kind of timber doesn’t generate jobs, export earnings or regional development. It’s speculative carbon farming.”
He says the system allows big urban emitters to buy their way out of reducing emissions while rural communities shoulder the long-term costs and consequences.
“Once you lose a productive sheep and beef farm to carbon forestry, it’s gone for good.”
He says the Government’s goal of doubling exports by 2030 is at risk under the proposed rules.
“Red meat is a cornerstone of our export economy, bringing in around $12 billion annually,” Dawkins says.
“With strong prices and advances in genetics, pasture management and technology, we should be focused on improving productivity and lifting output – not losing ground.”
Dawkins is calling on Forestry Minister Todd McClay to act.
“If this Government is serious about reining in whole-farm carbon conversions, the 25% cap must apply to all land classes – including classes 6 and 7.
“Our national values, our future as a food-producing nation, and the resilience of our rural communities are all on the line.
“We’re about to find out whether this Government truly stands with rural New Zealand or if this Bill is just political spin.”

Emergency Responses – NEMA identifies what caused emergency alert issues during Kamchatka tsunami event

Source: National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA)

 

The National Emergency Management Agency says it has got to the bottom of the issues reported by the public during the Kamchatka tsunami event of 30-31 July, when NEMA issued Emergency Mobile Alerts to warn people of dangerous tsunami activity in coastal areas.

 

NEMA’s Director Civil Defence Emergency Management John Price says the systems that issued and transmitted the alerts worked well on the day – and that public safety was at the centre of the decision to issue alerts. He says NEMA has now identified why some people received multiple alerts, or no alerts at all.

 

John Price says these issues are largely down to how different mobile devices behave, and the decision to send the alerts only to cellphones in coastal locations.

 

“First of all, we know explanations are little consolation for those who were awoken by alerts in the middle of the night. We are very sorry that this happened, and we’re looking at ways to address this in future. However, we make no apologies for getting the message out to keep people safe.

 

 

“NEMA only issued two alerts – at 4.13pm on 30 July and 6.30am on 31 July – but some people received multiple alerts during the night. We’ve discovered this is likely related to overnight software updates and device settings.

 

“As for those who didn’t receive alerts – tsunami alerts are only sent to coastal areas, so if you were inland then we didn’t send you the message because you were not at risk.

 

“The good news is that there is no problem with the systems we use to send the messages. The alerts were effective in reaching the targeted coastal areas and getting the message out to stay away of the water while dangerous tsunami activity was happening.

 

“We sent alerts to over three million mobile devices around the country, and when you consider the sheer variety of makes, models, and software, it’s inevitable some variations will emerge at the receiver end.

 

“After every emergency, we debrief to identify what went well and what needs to improve. We’re working through this now to ensure we’re doing the best we can at keeping people safe from tsunami and other threats.”

 

John Price says over 30 countries have cell broadcast alerting systems similar to New Zealand’s, and they have proven effective in alerting the public to severe and urgent threats to life, health or property.

 

“Emergency Mobile Alerts reach nine in ten people, so is a really reliable and effective way to get the message out so people know what to do to stay safe.”

 

Q&A

Why did I get multiple alerts?

Firstly – we are very sorry to everyone who found this disruptive, especially those who got woken several times in the middle of the night. This was not the intention and there are a few possible explanations.

  • When your phone does an automatic software update overnight it reboots. If you turn your phone off and on again during an alert broadcast, you will get the alert again. So when your phone reboots after an update, you will get the alert a second time.
  • During the early morning hours, some devices refresh their network connections. This process may have cleared cached data, prompting your phone to give you the alert again. While your device should recognise that it has already received and displayed the alert, it appears that some devices are more conservative and elect to redisplay. 
  • If you have multiple active Sims / eSims, you will get an alert for each Sim.
  • If your phone moved between 3G and 4G networks during the alert broadcast, you will get the alert again each time your phone connects to the new network. This can happen if you’re travelling into a poor coverage area, or if your phone drops in and out of networks.
  • Some phones have an optional alert reminder feature turned on. This can cause your phone to alarm repeatedly during the alert broadcast. If your phone does have this feature, you should be able to find it in your phone settings and turn it off.

As we don’t have any control over how individual devices behave, we can’t completely stop these issues from happening again – but we are looking at ways we can reduce their impact.

 

Why did I get the alert at a different time?

We issued the alerts at 4.13pm on 30 July – to warn that the dangerous tsunami activity would hit overnight – and on 6.30am the following morning – to warn that the activity was now hitting our shores. But we continued to transmit these alert broadcasts for several hours. This was so people entering the area later still got them.

You might have got an alert when commuting home at 5.30pm, or into work at 8am.

The most likely answer is that you were outside the coastal areas we sent the alert to. But then you entered the broadcast zone at a later time, triggering the alert on your phone.

So – if you took the 7am train from Upper Hutt to Wellington, you’d probably have received the alert around 7.20am as you entered Lower Hutt and into the coverage of the cell towers closer to the coast. Your fellow passengers may have received them at different times, depending on the location of their provider’s cell towers.

Or if your phone was off or in flight mode at the time the alert was sent, you would get the alert once your phone turned on or out of flight mode.

 

Why didn’t I get an alert?

Do you live in Hamilton? Palmerston North? Geraldine? Or perhaps an inland suburb of a coastal city?  Then don’t worry – we never sent it to you.

Emergency Mobile Alerts are sent to zones that are geotargeted based on where the risk from the hazard is. We identify the cell towers from all three telecommunications companies in the hazard area, draw a shape around them, and send the message to the area inside that shape.

Tsunami only impact coastal areas, so we issue alerts to geotargeted locations that are forecast to be impacted by the tsunami waves. For the Kamchatka event, we issued alerts to all coastal parts of New Zealand – but not to inland communities.  

Not inland? Check out our troubleshooting advice on why you might not have got an alert.

It’s important to remember that Emergency Mobile Alert is an extra channel to help keep you safe in an emergency. It does not replace other alerting systems or the need to take action after experiencing natural warning signs. Seek information from radio and other media, your local Civil Defence’s online channels, and trust your own danger sense if you experience natural warning signs such as a long or strong earthquake by the coast, or rising floodwaters.

 

Why did everyone in my house get the alert except me?

We get asked this a lot, and on the surface it must seem like something’s gone wrong. Usually there’s a straightforward explanation – you’re on the border of the geotargeted broadcast area.

The geotargeted areas aren’t a clean border. It dep