Posts

Posted on

Govt. response fails home support workers facing fuel crisis – must do better – PSA

Source: PSA

Time to raise mileage allowance for first time in four years
The Government’s decision to increase income support for low paid workers will not go far enough for 23,000 home support workers hit hardest by sharply rising petrol prices, and that a faster, simpler fix remains available right now.
Today’s announcement on increases to income support for working families fall well short of what home support workers need given many are filling up their own cars at least twice a week and many do not have dependent children.
“This is a really disappointing decision and completely ignores the financial pressure on these essential workers,” said Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi. “These workers have already had their pay equity claim cancelled by this government.
“Nicola Willis promised to help workers ‘acutely impacted’, but she has ignored home support workers. They are low paid, predominantly female workers who provide critical care to elderly and disabled New Zealanders every day. They are the only publicly funded workers required to use their own vehicles in this way. Rising petrol prices hit them directly in the pocket with every shift.
“If the Government is serious about protecting working people from this fuel crisis, it needs to do better and it still can. The Government has a fast, ready fix available by raising the mileage allowance.”
The Home and Community Support (Payment for Travel Between Clients) Settlement Act 2016 requires Health NZ Te Whatu Ora to pay home support workers a mileage rate. The allowance was last adjusted four years ago and is due for review (see explainer below).
“The Health Minister could direct that rate to be lifted immediately, no complicated fiddling with the tax and transfer system, no delay, just fast, real help for the people who need it most.”
Palmerston North home support worker Susan Miers is very disappointed. “It’s not very much really – it’s not going to make a difference to us,” In a typical day, Susan drives between clients across the city and the wider Manawatū region.
“I’m paying $40, $50 more a week than I was just a couple of weeks ago. It’s coming out of my food budget, because it’s the only thing I can change. I’ve already had to borrow money off of people to make things work.”
Fleur Fitzsimons: “The Government has ignored these workers in their time of need, rubbing more salt into their wounds. It’s disgraceful.
“The PSA will continue to fight for workers doing essential mahi in this crisis, workers who have no choice, but to drive to the people they care for every day. They deserve help now more than ever.”
Explainer – In-Between Travel Allowance
What is it? The In-Between Travel (IBT) allowance compensates home and community support workers for the time and vehicle costs of travelling between clients. It is governed by the Home and Community Support (Payment for Travel Between Clients) Settlement Act 2016.
Who does it cover? Around 23,000 home and community support workers who visit the elderly, disabled and injured in their homes, funded by Health NZ, MSD or ACC.
How does it work?
– Workers are paid a flat travel time payment (at their ordinary wage rate) for all trips between clients up to 15km of $2.35.
– It is meant to be a contribution to both maintenance and petrol costs.
– For trips over 15km (“exceptional travel”), workers are paid actual time and distance for that leg based on Google Maps
– Travel to the first client of the day and from the last client is not covered unless it exceeds 15km.
The rate and the problem: The mileage rate is currently 63.5 cents per kilometre – unchanged since March 2022. There have been only two increases in the rate's entire history (from 50c to 58.5c in August 2020, then to 63.5c in March 2022). The current IRD mileage rate is $1.17 per kilometre (petrol vehicles). Workers are being reimbursed at less than two-thirds of the IRD rate, and with the fuel price spike triggered by the Iran, they are now being reimbursed at well under half their actual costs.
The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is Aotearoa New Zealand's largest trade union, representing and supporting more than 95,000 workers across central government, state-owned enterprises, local councils, health boards and community groups.
Posted on

NZ Drug Foundation – Alarming increase in low-level drug prosecutions undermining health efforts

Source: New Zealand Drug Foundation

An alarming increase in drug possession charges is causing harm and undermining progress on health-based approaches, the Drug Foundation says.

New Ministry of Justice data shows 2025 had the highest number of low-level charges for drug possession or use in a decade.

Drug Foundation Executive Director Sarah Helm says the current approach is clearly not reducing drug use, but it is undermining efforts to reduce harm.

“Criminalising people clearly doesn’t deter use – in fact wastewater data out this week shows drug use is at record levels,” she says.

“What it does do is compound some of the worst drug harms by preventing people from seeking help and putting people through the justice system.”

“Our fifty-year-old drug laws have us stuck in this terrible loop where everyone loses. We are wasting huge amounts of money and Police resource on low-level prosecutions that discourage people from seeking support, and in the meantime drug use and harm are surging. We urgently need safer drug laws to break the circuit.”

The Drug Foundation released a blueprint for drug law reform last year in itsSafer drug laws for Aotearoa New Zealand report. (ref. https://drugfoundation.org.nz/news-and-reports/report-proposes-evidence-based-reform-to-new-zealands-drug-laws )

“The evidence from New Zealand and around the world is clear – we need a step-change in investment into harm reduction and health services, and safer drug laws that encourage people to seek support rather than punish them with criminal penalties,” says Helm.

Polling conducted by the Drug Foundation in 2022 showed 68% of New Zealanders supported ‘rewriting the Misuse of Drugs Act and putting in place a health-based approach’.

The increase in charges comes despite a 2019 amendment to the Misuse of Drugs Act instructing Police that a prosecution should not be brought unless it is in the public interest, and to consider health-centred approaches first.

Helm says the data shows relying on Police discretion isn’t adequate, with low-level drug charges following a similar trend to total criminal prosecutions since 2019.

“Police discretion is not how we should be dealing with such an important issue. The law should very clearly set out when people should face criminal penalties and when a health response is needed.”

Key stats from the Ministry of Justice

  • The number of drug possession/use charges in 2025 is the highest in the last decade: at 8,474 charges. The number of people convicted for drug/use possession in 2025 (3,158) is the second highest in ten years.
  • Nearly two-thirds (65%, or 3,158) of all drug convictions were for drug possession or use as the most serious drug offence. The proportion of possession/use convictions relative to all drug offences is the second highest in a decade. 
  • Each year since 2016, more people have been convicted of low-level drug offences than for supply, trafficking, or distribution combined. In 2025, 3,158 people were convicted of unlawful possession or use of drugs—the highest number since 2016, compared to 1,657 for supply, trafficking, or distribution.

Ministry of Justice data can be found at https://www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research-data/justice-statistics/data-tables/#General

Posted on

NZNO apologises for abuses in state care

Source: New Zealand Nurses Organisation

Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa NZNO apologises sincerely and unreservedly for the involvement of nurses in historic abuses in state care.
The apology was made in a video by NZNO Kaiwhakahaere Kerri Nuku and published today on the organisation’s website. It has already been shared with survivors and their whānau.
NZNO has also apologised unreservedly for any role nurses may have had in ignoring and not standing up to abuse in state care.
Kerri Nuku says for decades from the 1950s, children in psychiatric hospitals and other state and faith-based care suffered horrific abuse. 
“And among those responsible were nurses-our own profession. Nurses who were entrusted to care, to protect, to heal. Instead, some inflicted harm. Others turned away. This is a double betrayal, because care and compassion are the very essence of nursing. 
“The experiences of survivors, told to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care, were horrific, she says.
“These children were subjected to electric shocks, painful injections and degrading treatment. Nurses stood by while sexual abuse occurred. Some actively participated.”
Kerri Nuku says most of the children involved were Māori, placed in institutions because they were Māori. 
“Colonisation’s destructive intent was at work, and nurses became instruments of that harm. The scars left behind are not just physical. They are pervasive, lifelong, and intergenerational. Survivors and their whānau still carry the weight of trauma. Many do not trust nurses today – and that mistrust is justified.
“That this abuse occurred and for so long is a national disgrace. It is not only an issue of historical significance, but with abuse recognised up to 2019, it is also a contemporary issue. For this reason, NZNO joins calls for the swift implementation of all Royal Commissions’ recommendations.”
An apology without action is hollow, Kerri Nuku says. “Words alone cannot heal. We commit to ensuring this never happens again.” NZNO's response is guided by the findings of the Abuse in Care inquiries and the Lake Alice Hospital investigation and is a pledge to:
  • Embed trauma-informed and culturally safe practice in nursing education and professional development.
  • Advocate for a robust redress scheme that meets survivors’ needs and honours international standards.
  • Protect whistleblowers and enforce transparency, ensuring no member can hide from accountability.
  • Collaborate with the Nursing Council of New Zealand to strengthen Codes of Conduct and Ethics, making care synonymous with safety and dignity.
These actions reflect NZNO's commitment to tika and pono – or justice and truth – and to restoring the trust that was broken, Kerri Nuku says. 
Posted on

Advocacy – Call for Ethical Review of University of Otago Corporate Partnership

Source: Statement by the Palestine Forum of New Zealand

The Palestine Forum of New Zealand expresses deep concern regarding the reported partnership between the University of Otagoand Palo Alto Networks, a company with well-documented ties to Israel’s military and intelligence infrastructure.

At a time when the world is witnessing unprecedented devastation in Gaza Strip and escalating violence across the occupied Palestinian territories, such partnerships raise serious ethical questions. Institutions of higher learning are not merely centres of education; they are moral actors with a responsibility to uphold human rights, justice, and international law.

Engaging with companies linked to systems of surveillance, control, and military operations connected to the ongoing oppression of the Palestinian people risks normalising and legitimising these practices. This stands in direct contradiction to the values that universities in Aotearoa New Zealand claim to uphold.

We remind our academic institutions that they carry a duty as the “critic and conscience of society.” This duty requires not only intellectual independence, but moral clarity, especially in times of profound global injustice.

The Palestine Forum of New Zealand calls on the University of Otago to:

Reconsider and suspend this partnership pending transparent ethical review
Engage openly with students, staff, and the wider community
Align its institutional decisions with international human rights principles

We further call on universities and institutions across Aotearoa New Zealand to carefully assess their relationships and ensure they are not complicit in systems that perpetuate injustice.

Our position is grounded in the principles of dignity, accountability, and solidarity. We support all peaceful and lawful efforts, including global civil society initiatives, that seek to uphold the rights of the Palestinian people.

In moments like these, neutrality is not an option. Institutions must choose whether they stand on the side of justice or risk being remembered for their silence.

Posted on

Greenpeace – Worst in a generation, environmentalists slam Fisheries Reform Bill

Source: Greenpeace

The Fisheries Amendment Bill, which will likely have its first reading in parliament this week, is being labelled the worst fisheries policy in a generation by environmental groups who are calling for it to be rejected to protect ocean health.
The bill, pushed by Fisheries Minister Shane Jones, would significantly reduce public input on ocean management and hand unprecedented control over to the fishing industry – while eroding scrutiny.
It includes the proposal to slap a fine of up to $50,000 on anyone sharing cameras on boats footage, reducing public consultation and incentivising trawling ahead of cleaner fishing methods, plus reducing penalties for exceeding catch limits. It is set to go through its first reading in parliament this week. 
 Greenpeace oceans lead Ellie Hooper says: “This bill is a bonfire. It’s a blank cheque written for the trawling industry, that incentivises the most destructive types of fishing and gives the middle finger to New Zealanders who care about protecting the ocean. It is absolutely one of the worst fisheries policies we’ve seen in decades.
 “Nobody voted for this and already we’ve heard strong objections from New Zealanders across the political spectrum – from recreational fishers to environmentalists and ocean advocates. People want a healthy thriving ocean, a move away from destructive bottom trawling, and to know what the industry impact is on the ocean. These amendments are the opposite of that.
“Political leaders must listen to the public and reject this bill. We’ve already seen National admit huge regret over allowing marine protection to be weakened in Hauraki Gulf. Well now’s the time to have a backbone and vote it down. Jones and NZ First are running fisheries management as if they’re employed by the commercial trawling industry.”
Karli Thomas from the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, says more than 100,000 people have called on the government to ban bottom trawling on seamounts, yet the government is ignoring those concerns completely.
“It’s clear that ocean protection, and what New Zealanders want, have been shelved to make way for measures that essentially roll out the red carpet for the commercial fishing industry.
“If this legislation passes it will make it easier for bottom trawlers to carry out wholesale ocean destruction, and evidence of that damage would never see the light of day. Our fishing industry relies on social license and its environmental credentials – but this Bill sets us back decades: literally incentivising the most destructive fishing method, industrial factory trawling, at the expense of those who are trying to fish more sustainably. 
 “We need a healthy ocean where fish populations have a chance to recover, and ocean habitats can thrive. For that to happen the fishing industry must be held accountable. We already know that every year, trawl nets haul up thousands of kilograms of ancient corals, bulldoze the seafloor and kill ocean life including dolphins, seals and seabirds.
“We need more ocean protection, not a weakening of the little protection we already have. Now is the time for politicians to take a stand on behalf of the vast majority of New Zealanders who want to protect the ocean.”
Barry Weeber of ECO said that the legislation was a major step backwards in ecologically sustainable fisheries.
“With the proposed amendments the Minister could ignore the obligations in the principles of the Act that are designed to protect habitats and maintain biodiversity while setting catch limits.”
The proposals also over-turn international obligations including to apply the precautionary approach in making decisions on fisheries management. “The changes give too much power to the Minister while ignoring the needs to consider the impacts of fishing on the marine environment and other interests”, says Weeber.
Posted on

Greenpeace – We need solutions not bandaids on the energy crisis

Source: Greenpeace

Greenpeace is calling on the Government to implement actual solutions to the energy crisis, not just short-term band aids. The Government plans to release its response to the energy crisis today.
“As a nation we need to free ourselves from fossil fuel dependency if we are to deal with the energy crisis and the climate crisis,” says Greenpeace Aotearoa Executive Director Dr Russel Norman..
“The Government has spent two years making the country more fossil fuel dependent. They cancelled cycleways, cut public transport, subsidised new motorways, cut the clean car discount, weakened fuel efficiency standards and increased speed limits.
“The Government cancelled the gas transition plan, the big battery project and wants to spend billions on an LNG import terminal. They blocked offshore wind generation by pushing seabed mining in the same location.
“It is time for them to admit they took the nation down a dead end – a dead end of expensive fossil fuel energy and climate disaster.
“It’s time for Luxon to issue a mea culpa.
“Real solutions mean focusing on transport solutions that reduce fossil fuel dependency such as investment in cycleways, trains, and buses.
“Making buses and trains free immediately would be a good start, as would the rapid rollout of temporary protected cycleways.
“Real solutions mean investing in more renewable electricity generation such as solar and wind, as well as more battery storage.
“And real solutions mean reducing the dependence on synthetic nitrogen fertiliser produced from fossil gas.
“And for goodness sake, let’s stop private jets from refuelling while we are short of jetfuel.
“We have the solutions to free our nation from fossil fuel dependence while cutting our climate pollution and saving ourselves a fortune.
“Now we need the Government to free its policy from the grip of the oil and gas companies.”
Posted on

Universities – Climate in the courtroom- UoA

Source: University of Auckland (UoA)

Around the world, climate lawsuits are reshaping environmental law. Experts in Auckland are examining what this means for New Zealand.

The effects of climate change, government responses and accountability are debated by politicians, protested in the streets, and increasingly, tested in court.

More than 3,000 climate litigation cases have been filed worldwide, and this month, climate law experts are at the University of Auckland to debate and discuss climate action in the courts at the 2026 Climate Litigation Conference: http://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/law/events/climate-in-the-courtroom.html

As climate impacts intensify, more people are asking judges to decide what governments and companies are legally required to do if they're involved in climate harm or have a role in addressing its impacts.

University of Auckland environmental law expert and conference co-organiser Associate Professor Vernon Rive says the field is evolving quickly.

He says: “We're looking at how overseas and international developments shape New Zealand climate law, the limits and possibilities of common law remedies like public nuisance, and how attribution science is being reflected in cases.

“This conference offers rare access to leaders in the field; judges, academics, scientists and legal practitioners, who have front-line expertise and deep knowledge in climate change litigation in New Zealand and internationally.”

Jessica Palairet, Executive Director of Lawyers for Climate Action NZ, is chairing a panel on global trends in climate litigation. She says it's becoming one of the most important ways climate governance is being contested and shaped worldwide.

“We are living in an era of climate consequences, and climate litigation is one of the most interesting and important responses. These cases test complex legal questions about responsibilities and duties relating to climate mitigation and adaptation.”

Internationally, claims aimed at major emitters are accelerating. Professor Jacqueline Peel, Director of Melbourne Climate Futures at the University of Melbourne and a conference speaker, says a major trend is the increasing emphasis on corporate accountability.

“Increasingly, transnational claims are targeting companies for harms from high-emitting activities.”

New Zealand cases are also informing global debates about what climate harm looks like in law. Simon Ladd KC, Executive Director of the Legal Research Foundation – also co-hosting the conference – points to the landmark Smith v Fonterra lawsuit as an example of a case in which the role of the common law in climate litigation is front and centre.

The lawsuit saw iwi leader Mike Smith sue several private companies, including Fonterra. Smith alleges their greenhouse gas emissions contribute to global heating and harm him, his whānau, descendants, and others.
 
The case, due to proceed in the High Court in 2027, set an important precedent when the Supreme Court permitted the question of whether tort law can, and should, respond to climate change to proceed to trial. The Court also recognised the role that tikanga Māori may play in the development of tort law in New Zealand.

“The common law can develop and evolve, but should it?  If it should, where are the limits? Fundamentally, what is the role of private law claims in meeting the challenge of climate change?” asks Ladd.

Meanwhile, Auckland Law School Professor Caroline Foster is chairing a discussion on the International Court of Justice's Advisory Opinion on Climate Change and its implications for New Zealand.

Foster is interested in how New Zealand legislators, courts, and decision-makers view due diligence requirements in international law.

“I'm also looking forward to discussions on the relevance of customary international law within the common law, and how the common law can protect New Zealanders' interests in a stable planet.”

The 2026 Climate Litigation Conference is co-hosted by the University of Auckland's New Zealand Centre for Environmental Law, Legal Research Foundation and Lawyers for Climate Action New Zealand.

Posted on

Economy – RBNZ Governor discusses impact of Middle East conflict on NZ economy

Source: Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ)

24 March 2026 – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) is well positioned to handle the challenges to our price stability and financial stability mandates caused by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, Governor Anna Breman says in a speech published today.

“We are likely to see higher headline inflation over the near term, and somewhat weaker growth momentum,” Governor Breman says.

In the speech, Global shockwaves to Kiwi shores: The impact of the Iran conflict on New Zealand, Governor Breman acknowledged the uncertainty and hardship that many households and firms are experiencing at this difficult time.

“There is a risk that global financial stability risks could emerge and affect the cost and availability of funding for New Zealand banks. However, recent stress testing suggests that banks are resilient with strong capital and liquidity buffers, and are well-placed to weather severe geopolitical shocks.”

Governor Breman also set out the framework that the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) will use to assess the appropriate monetary policy response to the effects of the conflict in the Middle East on New Zealand's economy.

“Getting this judgement right is key to avoiding reacting too early to near-term inflation pressures that monetary policy can do little about – or reacting too late if above-target inflation becomes embedded in the economy,” Governor Breman says.

“Most importantly, monetary policy can and should ensure that a temporary inflation spike does not turn into enduring inflationary pressures. The Committee will be vigilant to this risk.

“The best contribution that monetary policy can make to the wellbeing of New Zealanders is to deliver low and stable inflation over the medium term.”

More information

Download the speech – Global shockwaves to Kiwi shores: The impact of the Iran conflict on New Zealand: https://govt.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=bd316aa7ee4f5679c56377819&id=71bf51470e&e=f3c68946f8
April 2026 Monetary Policy Review and OCR: https://govt.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=bd316aa7ee4f5679c56377819&id=5a0b9e5b9e&e=f3c68946f8

Posted on

Defence News – Emotional return to Tokelau for Royal New Zealand Navy sailor

Source: New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF)

Returning to her spiritual home of Tokelau was a profound experience for Petty Officer Christina Sola, who visited the island while on deployment with the Royal New Zealand Navy (RNZN) during the recent Operation Calypso in the South West Pacific.

New Zealand-born, but of Tokelauan, Samoan and New Zealand European descent, Petty Officer Sola reconnected with whānau when HMNZS Canterbury arrived in Tokelau.

Incorporated in the operation was the celebration of the centenary of New Zealand’s administration of Tokelau and on board the ship for the occasion was New Zealand Governor-General Dame Cindy Kiro.

“To step ashore alongside my shipmates, and on this occasion in the presence of the Governor‑General Dame Cindy Kiro, was an immense honour and a moment of profound personal and cultural significance,” Petty Officer Sola said.

“Tokelau is my tūrangawaewae – a place where I feel grounded spiritually, mentally and physically. It is sacred and treasured land, richly woven with history, culture and tradition. Each time I arrive, it instantly feels like home.”

Petty Officer Sola’s Tokelauan family hails from Fakaofo atoll. Her husband Penehe, also of Tokelauan descent, comes from the atolls of Nukunonu and Atafu. They have four children and she credits her husband’s unwavering support for being able to continue doing the job she loves in the Navy.

The communications warfare specialist enlisted in 2008 and has worked across a wide range of operational and leadership roles supporting New Zealand’s defence and security efforts, both at home and around the world.

She last visited Tokelau in 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic. Petty Officer Sola said the situation was entirely different then and the stakes couldn’t have been higher.

“Canterbury was tasked to deliver routine cyclone season support and essential supplies. This included new freshwater tanks, solar equipment, generator maintenance, and most importantly, Covid-19 vaccination supplies.

“Tokelau had no recorded cases of Covid-19 at the time and there was a very real possibility that, if we were not careful, we could have been the ones to introduce the virus to a population of fewer than 1,500 people.

“I was incredibly grateful that our deployable teams completed the mission without any incident and I was still able to see my family, while not touching one another to keep the strict two-metre distancing policy in place.”

This recent arrival was very different from the last, with loved ones from both her own and her husband’s family welcoming her across the three Tokelauan atolls.

“These are moments I will cherish forever. I will always acknowledge the sacrifices they have made – and continue to make – so that our families around the world can pursue opportunities and lives abroad, including those of us living and serving in Aotearoa, New Zealand.”

Petty Officer Sola’s career has seen her sail from the sub-Antarctic to the Pacific, across to Asia and over to the United States.

As part of the Navy’s extensive operation to the South-West Pacific and alongside the Tokelau centenary visit, HMNZS Canterbury crew facilitated an upgrade of critical tsunami and volcano monitoring equipment on Raoul Island, and conducted a successful search and rescue operation near Tonga.  

With New Zealand Army and Royal New Zealand Air Force personnel aboard, the military sealift vessel covered 4580 nautical miles, without the ship needing to take on additional food or fuel over 23 days.  

Posted on

Politics and Health – ACT should leave nursing to professionals and medical evidence – NZNO

Source: New Zealand Nurses Organisation

The ACT Party should leave nursing to the professionals and medical evidence, NZNO says.
Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa NZNO Kaiwhakahaere Kerri Nuku says ACT MP Todd Stephenson has dismissed the Nursing Council’s draft code of conduct – which proposes strengthening cultural safety, whānau-centred care and te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations – as political ideology.
“This is not political ideology. It is evidence-based health care which has been proven to be the key to lifting health outcomes for Māori.
“ACT should leave nursing to professionals and medical evidence,” Kerri Nuku says.
“Culturally safe care reduces health inequities, keeps more Māori out of hospital by helping identify the risk of preventable illnesses and enabling early intervention, and saves the health system money – something dear to the ACT Party,” she says.
“Todd Stephenson wants health care based on need not race. There can only be equal health care if there are equal health outcomes. Māori life expectancy is seven years lower than non-Māori and Māori are more likely to suffer heart disease, cancers, diabetes and mental health issues.
“Many Māori fear hospitals and the health system, which has been found to be systemically racist. Without culturally safe health care, Māori will continue to suffer poorer health outcomes and lead sicker and shorter lives than other New Zealanders.
“As well as the devastation to lives and whānau health and wellbeing, it costs Aotearoa more in the long run,” Kerri Nuku says.