Source: PSA
Health – Strengthening the primary care workforce: The College welcomes employment changes for GPEP 1 registrars
Source: Royal NZ College of General Practitioners
Tax Reform – Report shows wealth tax practical and necessary to address increasing inequality
5 March 2026, 6:30am – Taxing wealth is a practical and necessary step to address increasing inequality, according to a research report released today by Tax Justice Aotearoa and the Better Taxes for a Better Future Campaign.
The report by Tayla Forward shows that a well-designed and enforced wealth tax can help restore progressivity to New Zealand's tax system and generate significant revenue to better fund the public goods and services we all rely upon, but which are crumbling with the weight of underfunding.
“In 2023 IRD research found the wealthiest 311 families paid an effective tax rate of 9%, while ordinary people who earn their income from work or welfare pay 20% on average. That's because our tax system relies too much on income tax and GST, and does not tax wealth in any meaningful way. This report shows that if we get the settings right a wealth tax is a practical and necessary step in addressing this unfairness,” said Glenn Barclay, spokesperson for Tax Justice Aotearoa and the Better Taxes Campaign.
“Right now ordinary people are contributing more to our collective pool of resources, even though the wealthiest benefit just as much – if not more – from our public goods and services. At the same time, by not taxing wealth we are making inequality worse, enabling the ultra rich to claim an ever greater share of our wealth. Treasury analysis shows the wealthiest 1% of New Zealanders now hold 26% of all assets, while the poorest 50% own just 2% of assets.”
“This increasing inequality is undermining the living standards and opportunities for ordinary people, making it harder for people to ever have enough to buy a home or save for retirement,” said Barclay.
“Poll results released yesterday by Better Taxes Coalition member the Wellbeing Economy Alliance showed that 68% of people support higher taxes on the ultra rich. And that's the focus of wealth taxes – the ultra rich – we're not talking about taxing the hard-earned income of doctors, builders and small-business owners. The poll indicates that the public are ready for taxes on wealth, if properly explained.”
As set out in the report, a net wealth tax:
is an annual tax levied on the net wealth (assets minus debt) that a taxpayer owns above an exemption threshold – e.g. $2m, $5m, $10m. No one with net wealth below the threshold is liable for the tax, and those liable are only taxed on their wealth beyond the threshold – net wealth up to the threshold is exempt;
usually has a low rate – the report considers rates between 1-2% – but still generates revenues in the billions of dollars; and
can be designed to address potential evasion and avoidance, and cashflow/liquidity issues. Further, much feared capital flight is largely “unproductive financial shuffling”, rather than real productivity losses.
“As Tayla Forward states in the report, there is a compelling case for wealth taxation to generate revenue we need to fund our communities, and to address wealth inequality and the concentration of economic power, which undermines living standards, as well as our democratic system and economic efficiency,” said Barclay.
“Further, the report is clear that it is possible to design and implement wealth taxes in ways that address common issues experienced overseas. The real question is whether our leaders are prepared to make the political commitment necessary to ensure ordinary people can still realistically work towards owning their own home, supporting their family and a comfortable retirement, with the support of properly funded public goods and services.”
About the report author:
Tayla Forward (Ngāpuhi) is a researcher in economics and political economy based in Tāmaki Makaurau. Fellow of the World Inequality Lab, postgraduate student at the Paris School of Economics, and a research associate at Victoria University of Wellington and at the University of Canterbury. Formerly analyst at the Treasury and Private Secretary to the Minister of Finance.
Health and Care – Royal Commission highlights critical role of aged care in protecting New Zealand’s health system
Source: Aged Care Association
Environment Groups: Statement – Community Demands Answers Over Glyphosate Spraying in Te Henga Wetlands – NMGNZ
The controversial operation, reportedly carried out by the environmental group Matuku Link, involves the aerial application of glyphosate formulations to kill willow trees within a sensitive wetland ecosystem in West Auckland.
The wetlands of Te Henga are recognised habitat for critically endangered species, including bats and nationally significant bird populations such as the Australasian bittern. Wetlands also represent some of the most ecologically sensitive environments in New Zealand, making the use of agrichemicals in such areas particularly contentious.
Recent documentation reviewed by No More Glyphosate NZ raises serious questions about whether adequate environmental safeguards and community consultation have taken place.
Chemical risks in wetland environments
Technical analysis of the operation indicates that the herbicide Polaris 450, a glyphosate-based product, was reportedly used alongside Aquakynde, an additional surfactant designed to increase herbicide penetration.
According to product safety data sheets and regulatory classifications:
- Polaris 450 is classified as harmful if inhaled, causing serious eye irritation, and toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects.
- Aquakynde surfactants are associated with serious eye damage and aquatic toxicity, with documented impacts on aquatic organisms at very low concentrations.
Importantly, the safety documentation for Polaris 450 explicitly warns users not to allow the product to enter waterways.
Yet wetlands, by their very nature, consist of interconnected pools, saturated soils, and slow-moving water systems that can facilitate chemical movement and persistence.
When glyphosate formulations are combined with additional surfactants, studies show the aquatic toxicity of the mixture can increase significantly, particularly affecting amphibians, aquatic invertebrates, and early life stages of wildlife.
Compliance questions remain unanswered
Independent technical review has highlighted that spraying herbicides in or near standing water in wetlands creates high-risk exposure pathways through spray drift, wash-off, and sediment binding.
Under New Zealand's hazardous substances framework, agrichemicals with aquatic toxicity classifications are normally prohibited from being applied directly into water unless stringent additional controls are met.
Regional planning rules, including the Auckland Unitary Plan (Chapter E34 – Agrichemicals), require agrichemical spraying to avoid spray drift into “sensitive areas” such as water bodies and wetlands, requiring strict management of spray drift, operator competence, and environmental safeguards.
In complex wetland systems like Te Henga, experts note that preventing herbicide movement beyond the spray site can be extremely difficult.
No More Glyphosate NZ believes the public deserves clear answers to several critical questions:
- What independent monitoring has been undertaken to assess environmental impacts?
- Has baseline and post-spray water or sediment testing been conducted for glyphosate and its breakdown product AMPA?
- What monitoring has been undertaken to protect endangered wildlife species in the spray area?
- What safeguards were implemented to prevent spray drift affecting nearby residents, wildlife, and waterways?
- Were local residents adequately informed prior to spraying?
- How were concerns from community members and environmental groups addressed?
Community trust at stake
Reports indicate that members of the local community have raised concerns with Auckland Council and environmental organisations for over a year, including meetings with council officials and submissions providing scientific data on wildlife impacts.
Despite this, the recent spraying reportedly proceeded while legal action was being pursued to halt the operation.
For many residents, the issue goes beyond the control of invasive willow trees.
It raises deeper concerns about public accountability, environmental stewardship, and the use of toxic herbicides in sensitive ecosystems.
A call for precaution and transparency
No More Glyphosate NZ is calling for:
- An immediate pause on herbicide spraying in the Te Henga wetlands
- An independent compliance and environmental review of the spraying operations
- Full disclosure of monitoring data, environmental assessments, and operational plans
- Genuine community consultation and transparency before any further spraying is considered.
“Wetlands are among the most fragile ecosystems we have,” said a spokesperson for No More Glyphosate NZ.
“When chemicals classified as toxic to aquatic life are sprayed in these environments, the burden of proof must be extremely high that no harm will occur.”
“Right now, the public simply doesn't have enough information to be confident that this standard has been met.”
Until those questions are answered, the organisation believes the precautionary principle should apply.
“This is not an emergency situation. Taking the time to ensure environmental safeguards and community concerns are properly addressed should be the responsible course of action.”
About No More Glyphosate NZ
No More Glyphosate NZ is an independent public-interest initiative advocating for greater transparency, safer weed management practices, and reduced reliance on glyphosate-based herbicides in New Zealand.
The organisation works with communities, researchers, and environmental advocates to promote evidence-based decision making and protect public and ecological health.
Transport groups unite in call for driver licensing support
Source: Ia Ara Aotearoa Transporting New Zealand
Culture Art Environment – HĪKOI O TE TAOKA | MARCH OF THE TREASURE
Location: Ōtepoti Dunedin, Aotearoa New Zealand
Hīkoi o te Taoka | March of the Treasure is a powerful travelling public art protest across Te Waipounamu (the South Island), uniting communities and visitors through large-scale art to protect one of the world’s rarest penguins: the beloved hoiho (yellow-eyed penguin).
From Dunedin to Queenstown, larger-than-life hoiho statues will appear in prominent public spaces, transforming everyday locations into a moving call for environmental action. The exhibition blends art, storytelling, and awareness to shine a spotlight on the urgent plight of this taonga species.
Hīkoi o te Taoka, meaning March of the Treasure, reflects the deep cultural and environmental value of the hoiho to Aotearoa. Reimagining activism as a living gallery of hope, the campaign invites people to stop, reflect, and take responsibility for the future of a species on the brink of extinction.
“The hoiho is quietly disappearing from our coastline,” says Jerad Haldan, Trustee of the Otago Shore & Land Trust.
“This hīkoi is about giving the hoiho a voice, through art that stops people in their tracks and reminds us that there is still time to act, if we choose to.”
Art with a Purpose
Each life-sized statue is a vivid artistic expression, designed to spark conversation and connection. Together, they tell the story of the hoiho’s struggle and resilience, reminding us that the survival of this delicate species lies in human hands.
Today, fewer than 400 hoiho remain. Habitat loss, disease, warming seas, and overfishing continue to threaten their survival.
The hoiho is more than an endangered species. It is a treasured New Zealand icon, featured on the $5 note, and a drawcard for visitors from around the world who travel to Otago hoping to glimpse this rare and shy penguin in the wild.
A Call to Action for Media and Community
Hīkoi o te Taoka invites local, national, and international media to follow the hīkoi and share the stories of the statue sponsors (wildlife guardians), artists, conservationists, and communities working to protect this precious species before it is lost forever.
Media outlets, photographers, influencers, and content creators are encouraged to visit the installations, capture the artworks, and amplify the campaign’s message.
Opportunities include visual storytelling, artist and conservation interviews, and coverage of how art-led activism can inspire environmental change.
Installation Locations
Dunedin: Tūhura Reserve, Dunedin Railway Platform, Larnach Castle, plus a roving hoiho appearing at pop-up locations
Oamaru: Cycle Journeys, Victorian Precinct
Wānaka: Outside Puzzling World
Arrowtown: Outside Lakes District Museum
Queenstown: Queenstown Airport terminal, Steamer Wharf, LyLo Hotel.
Hīkoi o te Taoka — March of the Treasure Together
The 10 hoiho statues will then make their way back to Dunedin, where they will be displayed together. The final journey — the march of the hoiho back home — will take place on the following dates at these locations:
The Octagon: 5–10 April 2026
Wild Dunedin’s NatureDome event at Forsyth Barr Stadium: 12 April 2026
Tūhura Otago Museum Exhibition: 14 April – 14 May 2026
Tūhura Otago Museum Live Auction: 8 May 2026
Website: www.otagoshoreandland.org/the-hikoi-project
Follow the journey on social media: #HīkoioteTaoka #ArtForHoiho #MarchTheTreasure
