Advocacy – Call for Ethical Review of University of Otago Corporate Partnership

Source: Statement by the Palestine Forum of New Zealand

The Palestine Forum of New Zealand expresses deep concern regarding the reported partnership between the University of Otagoand Palo Alto Networks, a company with well-documented ties to Israel’s military and intelligence infrastructure.

At a time when the world is witnessing unprecedented devastation in Gaza Strip and escalating violence across the occupied Palestinian territories, such partnerships raise serious ethical questions. Institutions of higher learning are not merely centres of education; they are moral actors with a responsibility to uphold human rights, justice, and international law.

Engaging with companies linked to systems of surveillance, control, and military operations connected to the ongoing oppression of the Palestinian people risks normalising and legitimising these practices. This stands in direct contradiction to the values that universities in Aotearoa New Zealand claim to uphold.

We remind our academic institutions that they carry a duty as the “critic and conscience of society.” This duty requires not only intellectual independence, but moral clarity, especially in times of profound global injustice.

The Palestine Forum of New Zealand calls on the University of Otago to:

Reconsider and suspend this partnership pending transparent ethical review
Engage openly with students, staff, and the wider community
Align its institutional decisions with international human rights principles

We further call on universities and institutions across Aotearoa New Zealand to carefully assess their relationships and ensure they are not complicit in systems that perpetuate injustice.

Our position is grounded in the principles of dignity, accountability, and solidarity. We support all peaceful and lawful efforts, including global civil society initiatives, that seek to uphold the rights of the Palestinian people.

In moments like these, neutrality is not an option. Institutions must choose whether they stand on the side of justice or risk being remembered for their silence.

Greenpeace – Worst in a generation, environmentalists slam Fisheries Reform Bill

Source: Greenpeace

The Fisheries Amendment Bill, which will likely have its first reading in parliament this week, is being labelled the worst fisheries policy in a generation by environmental groups who are calling for it to be rejected to protect ocean health.
The bill, pushed by Fisheries Minister Shane Jones, would significantly reduce public input on ocean management and hand unprecedented control over to the fishing industry – while eroding scrutiny.
It includes the proposal to slap a fine of up to $50,000 on anyone sharing cameras on boats footage, reducing public consultation and incentivising trawling ahead of cleaner fishing methods, plus reducing penalties for exceeding catch limits. It is set to go through its first reading in parliament this week. 
 Greenpeace oceans lead Ellie Hooper says: “This bill is a bonfire. It’s a blank cheque written for the trawling industry, that incentivises the most destructive types of fishing and gives the middle finger to New Zealanders who care about protecting the ocean. It is absolutely one of the worst fisheries policies we’ve seen in decades.
 “Nobody voted for this and already we’ve heard strong objections from New Zealanders across the political spectrum – from recreational fishers to environmentalists and ocean advocates. People want a healthy thriving ocean, a move away from destructive bottom trawling, and to know what the industry impact is on the ocean. These amendments are the opposite of that.
“Political leaders must listen to the public and reject this bill. We’ve already seen National admit huge regret over allowing marine protection to be weakened in Hauraki Gulf. Well now’s the time to have a backbone and vote it down. Jones and NZ First are running fisheries management as if they’re employed by the commercial trawling industry.”
Karli Thomas from the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, says more than 100,000 people have called on the government to ban bottom trawling on seamounts, yet the government is ignoring those concerns completely.
“It’s clear that ocean protection, and what New Zealanders want, have been shelved to make way for measures that essentially roll out the red carpet for the commercial fishing industry.
“If this legislation passes it will make it easier for bottom trawlers to carry out wholesale ocean destruction, and evidence of that damage would never see the light of day. Our fishing industry relies on social license and its environmental credentials – but this Bill sets us back decades: literally incentivising the most destructive fishing method, industrial factory trawling, at the expense of those who are trying to fish more sustainably. 
 “We need a healthy ocean where fish populations have a chance to recover, and ocean habitats can thrive. For that to happen the fishing industry must be held accountable. We already know that every year, trawl nets haul up thousands of kilograms of ancient corals, bulldoze the seafloor and kill ocean life including dolphins, seals and seabirds.
“We need more ocean protection, not a weakening of the little protection we already have. Now is the time for politicians to take a stand on behalf of the vast majority of New Zealanders who want to protect the ocean.”
Barry Weeber of ECO said that the legislation was a major step backwards in ecologically sustainable fisheries.
“With the proposed amendments the Minister could ignore the obligations in the principles of the Act that are designed to protect habitats and maintain biodiversity while setting catch limits.”
The proposals also over-turn international obligations including to apply the precautionary approach in making decisions on fisheries management. “The changes give too much power to the Minister while ignoring the needs to consider the impacts of fishing on the marine environment and other interests”, says Weeber.

Greenpeace – We need solutions not bandaids on the energy crisis

Source: Greenpeace

Greenpeace is calling on the Government to implement actual solutions to the energy crisis, not just short-term band aids. The Government plans to release its response to the energy crisis today.
“As a nation we need to free ourselves from fossil fuel dependency if we are to deal with the energy crisis and the climate crisis,” says Greenpeace Aotearoa Executive Director Dr Russel Norman..
“The Government has spent two years making the country more fossil fuel dependent. They cancelled cycleways, cut public transport, subsidised new motorways, cut the clean car discount, weakened fuel efficiency standards and increased speed limits.
“The Government cancelled the gas transition plan, the big battery project and wants to spend billions on an LNG import terminal. They blocked offshore wind generation by pushing seabed mining in the same location.
“It is time for them to admit they took the nation down a dead end – a dead end of expensive fossil fuel energy and climate disaster.
“It’s time for Luxon to issue a mea culpa.
“Real solutions mean focusing on transport solutions that reduce fossil fuel dependency such as investment in cycleways, trains, and buses.
“Making buses and trains free immediately would be a good start, as would the rapid rollout of temporary protected cycleways.
“Real solutions mean investing in more renewable electricity generation such as solar and wind, as well as more battery storage.
“And real solutions mean reducing the dependence on synthetic nitrogen fertiliser produced from fossil gas.
“And for goodness sake, let’s stop private jets from refuelling while we are short of jetfuel.
“We have the solutions to free our nation from fossil fuel dependence while cutting our climate pollution and saving ourselves a fortune.
“Now we need the Government to free its policy from the grip of the oil and gas companies.”

Universities – Climate in the courtroom- UoA

Source: University of Auckland (UoA)

Around the world, climate lawsuits are reshaping environmental law. Experts in Auckland are examining what this means for New Zealand.

The effects of climate change, government responses and accountability are debated by politicians, protested in the streets, and increasingly, tested in court.

More than 3,000 climate litigation cases have been filed worldwide, and this month, climate law experts are at the University of Auckland to debate and discuss climate action in the courts at the 2026 Climate Litigation Conference: http://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/law/events/climate-in-the-courtroom.html

As climate impacts intensify, more people are asking judges to decide what governments and companies are legally required to do if they're involved in climate harm or have a role in addressing its impacts.

University of Auckland environmental law expert and conference co-organiser Associate Professor Vernon Rive says the field is evolving quickly.

He says: “We're looking at how overseas and international developments shape New Zealand climate law, the limits and possibilities of common law remedies like public nuisance, and how attribution science is being reflected in cases.

“This conference offers rare access to leaders in the field; judges, academics, scientists and legal practitioners, who have front-line expertise and deep knowledge in climate change litigation in New Zealand and internationally.”

Jessica Palairet, Executive Director of Lawyers for Climate Action NZ, is chairing a panel on global trends in climate litigation. She says it's becoming one of the most important ways climate governance is being contested and shaped worldwide.

“We are living in an era of climate consequences, and climate litigation is one of the most interesting and important responses. These cases test complex legal questions about responsibilities and duties relating to climate mitigation and adaptation.”

Internationally, claims aimed at major emitters are accelerating. Professor Jacqueline Peel, Director of Melbourne Climate Futures at the University of Melbourne and a conference speaker, says a major trend is the increasing emphasis on corporate accountability.

“Increasingly, transnational claims are targeting companies for harms from high-emitting activities.”

New Zealand cases are also informing global debates about what climate harm looks like in law. Simon Ladd KC, Executive Director of the Legal Research Foundation – also co-hosting the conference – points to the landmark Smith v Fonterra lawsuit as an example of a case in which the role of the common law in climate litigation is front and centre.

The lawsuit saw iwi leader Mike Smith sue several private companies, including Fonterra. Smith alleges their greenhouse gas emissions contribute to global heating and harm him, his whānau, descendants, and others.
 
The case, due to proceed in the High Court in 2027, set an important precedent when the Supreme Court permitted the question of whether tort law can, and should, respond to climate change to proceed to trial. The Court also recognised the role that tikanga Māori may play in the development of tort law in New Zealand.

“The common law can develop and evolve, but should it?  If it should, where are the limits? Fundamentally, what is the role of private law claims in meeting the challenge of climate change?” asks Ladd.

Meanwhile, Auckland Law School Professor Caroline Foster is chairing a discussion on the International Court of Justice's Advisory Opinion on Climate Change and its implications for New Zealand.

Foster is interested in how New Zealand legislators, courts, and decision-makers view due diligence requirements in international law.

“I'm also looking forward to discussions on the relevance of customary international law within the common law, and how the common law can protect New Zealanders' interests in a stable planet.”

The 2026 Climate Litigation Conference is co-hosted by the University of Auckland's New Zealand Centre for Environmental Law, Legal Research Foundation and Lawyers for Climate Action New Zealand.

Economy – RBNZ Governor discusses impact of Middle East conflict on NZ economy

Source: Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ)

24 March 2026 – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) is well positioned to handle the challenges to our price stability and financial stability mandates caused by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, Governor Anna Breman says in a speech published today.

“We are likely to see higher headline inflation over the near term, and somewhat weaker growth momentum,” Governor Breman says.

In the speech, Global shockwaves to Kiwi shores: The impact of the Iran conflict on New Zealand, Governor Breman acknowledged the uncertainty and hardship that many households and firms are experiencing at this difficult time.

“There is a risk that global financial stability risks could emerge and affect the cost and availability of funding for New Zealand banks. However, recent stress testing suggests that banks are resilient with strong capital and liquidity buffers, and are well-placed to weather severe geopolitical shocks.”

Governor Breman also set out the framework that the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) will use to assess the appropriate monetary policy response to the effects of the conflict in the Middle East on New Zealand's economy.

“Getting this judgement right is key to avoiding reacting too early to near-term inflation pressures that monetary policy can do little about – or reacting too late if above-target inflation becomes embedded in the economy,” Governor Breman says.

“Most importantly, monetary policy can and should ensure that a temporary inflation spike does not turn into enduring inflationary pressures. The Committee will be vigilant to this risk.

“The best contribution that monetary policy can make to the wellbeing of New Zealanders is to deliver low and stable inflation over the medium term.”

More information

Download the speech – Global shockwaves to Kiwi shores: The impact of the Iran conflict on New Zealand: https://govt.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=bd316aa7ee4f5679c56377819&id=71bf51470e&e=f3c68946f8
April 2026 Monetary Policy Review and OCR: https://govt.us20.list-manage.com/track/click?u=bd316aa7ee4f5679c56377819&id=5a0b9e5b9e&e=f3c68946f8

Defence News – Emotional return to Tokelau for Royal New Zealand Navy sailor

Source: New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF)

Returning to her spiritual home of Tokelau was a profound experience for Petty Officer Christina Sola, who visited the island while on deployment with the Royal New Zealand Navy (RNZN) during the recent Operation Calypso in the South West Pacific.

New Zealand-born, but of Tokelauan, Samoan and New Zealand European descent, Petty Officer Sola reconnected with whānau when HMNZS Canterbury arrived in Tokelau.

Incorporated in the operation was the celebration of the centenary of New Zealand’s administration of Tokelau and on board the ship for the occasion was New Zealand Governor-General Dame Cindy Kiro.

“To step ashore alongside my shipmates, and on this occasion in the presence of the Governor‑General Dame Cindy Kiro, was an immense honour and a moment of profound personal and cultural significance,” Petty Officer Sola said.

“Tokelau is my tūrangawaewae – a place where I feel grounded spiritually, mentally and physically. It is sacred and treasured land, richly woven with history, culture and tradition. Each time I arrive, it instantly feels like home.”

Petty Officer Sola’s Tokelauan family hails from Fakaofo atoll. Her husband Penehe, also of Tokelauan descent, comes from the atolls of Nukunonu and Atafu. They have four children and she credits her husband’s unwavering support for being able to continue doing the job she loves in the Navy.

The communications warfare specialist enlisted in 2008 and has worked across a wide range of operational and leadership roles supporting New Zealand’s defence and security efforts, both at home and around the world.

She last visited Tokelau in 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic. Petty Officer Sola said the situation was entirely different then and the stakes couldn’t have been higher.

“Canterbury was tasked to deliver routine cyclone season support and essential supplies. This included new freshwater tanks, solar equipment, generator maintenance, and most importantly, Covid-19 vaccination supplies.

“Tokelau had no recorded cases of Covid-19 at the time and there was a very real possibility that, if we were not careful, we could have been the ones to introduce the virus to a population of fewer than 1,500 people.

“I was incredibly grateful that our deployable teams completed the mission without any incident and I was still able to see my family, while not touching one another to keep the strict two-metre distancing policy in place.”

This recent arrival was very different from the last, with loved ones from both her own and her husband’s family welcoming her across the three Tokelauan atolls.

“These are moments I will cherish forever. I will always acknowledge the sacrifices they have made – and continue to make – so that our families around the world can pursue opportunities and lives abroad, including those of us living and serving in Aotearoa, New Zealand.”

Petty Officer Sola’s career has seen her sail from the sub-Antarctic to the Pacific, across to Asia and over to the United States.

As part of the Navy’s extensive operation to the South-West Pacific and alongside the Tokelau centenary visit, HMNZS Canterbury crew facilitated an upgrade of critical tsunami and volcano monitoring equipment on Raoul Island, and conducted a successful search and rescue operation near Tonga.  

With New Zealand Army and Royal New Zealand Air Force personnel aboard, the military sealift vessel covered 4580 nautical miles, without the ship needing to take on additional food or fuel over 23 days.  

Politics and Health – ACT should leave nursing to professionals and medical evidence – NZNO

Source: New Zealand Nurses Organisation

The ACT Party should leave nursing to the professionals and medical evidence, NZNO says.
Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa NZNO Kaiwhakahaere Kerri Nuku says ACT MP Todd Stephenson has dismissed the Nursing Council’s draft code of conduct – which proposes strengthening cultural safety, whānau-centred care and te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations – as political ideology.
“This is not political ideology. It is evidence-based health care which has been proven to be the key to lifting health outcomes for Māori.
“ACT should leave nursing to professionals and medical evidence,” Kerri Nuku says.
“Culturally safe care reduces health inequities, keeps more Māori out of hospital by helping identify the risk of preventable illnesses and enabling early intervention, and saves the health system money – something dear to the ACT Party,” she says.
“Todd Stephenson wants health care based on need not race. There can only be equal health care if there are equal health outcomes. Māori life expectancy is seven years lower than non-Māori and Māori are more likely to suffer heart disease, cancers, diabetes and mental health issues.
“Many Māori fear hospitals and the health system, which has been found to be systemically racist. Without culturally safe health care, Māori will continue to suffer poorer health outcomes and lead sicker and shorter lives than other New Zealanders.
“As well as the devastation to lives and whānau health and wellbeing, it costs Aotearoa more in the long run,” Kerri Nuku says. 

Economy – Canterbury goes back-to-back in ASB’s latest Regional Economic Scoreboard

Source: ASB

  • South Island continues to hold strong with Canterbury outperforming the rest of the country
  • Otago and Waikato coming in second place equal
  • Auckland shows promising signs of improvement, jumps to fourth place
  • Wellington remains under pressure, finishing last place.

Canterbury continues to shine in ASB’s Regional Economic Scoreboard, finishing 2025 as New Zealand’s strongest-performing region as signs of economic recovery broaden across the country.

ASB’s Regional Economic Scoreboard shows Canterbury secured its third quarterly win of the year, outperforming the country across nearly every key measure the bank tracks including employment, retail spending, housing activity and population growth.

ASB Chief Economist Nick Tuffley says the South Island continues to lead New Zealand’s multi‑speed recovery.

“Canterbury has delivered back‑to‑back wins to close out the year, supported by strong dairy incomes, steady jobs growth, resilient consumer spending and the recovery of the tourism sector. The region enters 2026 in a very strong position,” says Nick.

Otago and Waikato tied for second place, with Otago buoyed by a strong tourism recovery and Waikato benefiting from its robust primary sector and improving labour market conditions. We expect the incoming Fonterra capital return to be a further boost for our Dairy farming regions via more spending and investment.

Auckland climbed to fourth place, recording improvements in retail spending, construction activity and consumer confidence, although labour market conditions in the city remain subdued.

“Seeing Auckland continue to improve is an important signal that the economic upswing is widening beyond the regions that led earlier in the cycle,” says Nick.

At the other end of the rankings, Wellington finished last, reflecting ongoing weakness in the housing market, construction activity and discretionary spending, despite relatively strong employment growth.

“Looking ahead, Wellington’s economy is forecast to recover, supported by low interest rates. Nevertheless, ongoing and emerging challenges may temper the pace of that recovery.”

Nationally, the economy showed signs of growth toward the end of 2025. Retail spending lifted strongly across most regions, supported by lower interest rates, while employment indicators showed early signs of stabilisation. However, ASB economists caution that global uncertainty remains a key risk.

“Conflict in the Middle East presents fresh headwinds, particularly through higher energy costs and inflation risks. The situation and extent of any impact to growth and inflation is highly uncertain and will depend on how long the conflict goes on for,” says Nick.

Results in a snapshot

About the ASB Regional Economic Scoreboard

The ASB Regional Economic Scoreboard takes the latest quarterly regional statistics and ranks the economic performance of New Zealand's 16 Regional Council areas. The fastest growing regions gain the highest ratings, and a good performance by the national economy raises the ratings of all regions. Ratings are updated every three months, and are based on 11 measures, including employment, construction, retail trade, and house prices.

 

The full ASB Regional Economic Scoreboard, along with other recent ASB reports covering a range of commentary, can be accessed at our ASB Economic Insights page: https://www.asb.co.nz/documents/economic-insights.html

Aged Care Assn: If we can fund EV chargers, why can’t we fund aged care beds?

Source: Aged Care Association

This week’s announcement that Government-backed loans will support the rollout of another 2,500 electric vehicle charging points across New Zealand is, in many ways, good news.
As an EV owner, I welcome the continued investment in infrastructure that supports the transition to a lower-emissions future. It is practical, forward-looking, and demonstrates that when Government identifies a priority, it can move with pace and purpose to enable private investment.
But it also raises a difficult question.
Why can we move quickly to support the infrastructure needed for vehicles, but not for the infrastructure needed to care for our ageing population?
For the past two years, the Aged Care Association has been calling for the establishment of a dedicated infrastructure fund to support residential aged care providers to upgrade facilities and build new beds, particularly for older New Zealanders who rely on superannuation or modest fixed incomes.
We are not asking for anything extraordinary. We are asking for recognition that aged residential care is essential health infrastructure.
New Zealand’s population aged over 65 is growing rapidly. At the same time, much of our aged care infrastructure is ageing, with a significant proportion of facilities more than 20 years old. Capacity is already constrained in many parts of the country, particularly for standard beds and specialist care such as dementia and palliative services.
This is not a future problem. It is happening now.
As the daughter of an 85-year-old, I think about this not just as a sector leader, but as a New Zealander. If my parent, or yours, requires hospital care, we expect that care to be available. But hospitals rely on the ability to discharge older patients into appropriate residential care. When there are no beds available, those patients remain in hospital longer than they need to, placing pressure on the entire health system.
This is where the issue becomes urgent.
A lack of residential care beds is not just an aged care issue – it is a hospital flow issue, an equity issue, and ultimately a system sustainability issue.
An infrastructure fund would allow providers, particularly not-for-profit and community-based organisations, to upgrade ageing facilities, expand capacity in areas of need, and build the types of services our communities require. It would support older people to remain closer to home and whānau and ensure timely access to appropriate care.
Importantly, this is not about replacing private investment. It is about unlocking it – just as the EV charging initiative does – by providing the confidence and support needed to invest in areas where returns are lower but social need is high.
We have seen that Government can act decisively when it chooses to. The question now is whether it will apply that same urgency to the infrastructure that supports our most vulnerable citizens.
Because at some point, this will matter to all of us.

Health – Record-breaking drug consumption shows, yet again, a new approach is needed

Source: NZ Drug Foundation Te Puna Whakaiti Pāmamae Kai Whakapiri

New data showing record-breaking cocaine consumption is just the latest evidence that the country’s drugs approach is failing, the NZ Drug Foundation says.

New wastewater testing data released by Police today shows cocaine consumption surged nationwide to an all-time high in Q4 2025, exceeding MDMA consumption for the first time. Meanwhile, methamphetamine consumption remained stubbornly high following a doubling in the second half of 2024. (ref. https://www.police.govt.nz/about-us/publication/national-drugs-wastewater-testing-programme-quarter-4-2025 )

“Cocaine consumption has been increasing since mid-2022. Cocaine carries increased risk of a few harms, including increased addiction and overdose,” says Drug Foundation Executive Director Sarah Helm.

The data is a stark illustration that we have our policy settings wrong.

“The dramatic increases in methamphetamine and cocaine consumption over the last two years are unprecedented,” she says.

“A long-term under-investment in treatment and harm reduction, coupled with an over-reliance on supply side measures hasn’t worked,” says Helm.

“Consumption is at record levels, drug use is diversifying, prices are down, harm is increasing, and new potent drugs are arriving. Every indicator is screaming at us to change our approach,” Helm says.

Helm says new interventions announced last week in the Government’s Action Plan to Prevent and Reduce Substance Harm will go some way to responding to the increase in harm, but a more fundamental shift is needed.

“If we could wave a magic wand, we would do two things: vastly increase the spending on addiction treatment and harm reduction, and change our drug laws. While these things won’t remove all problems, the evidence is clear that it would reduce the worst harms and provide us with more tools to tackle the increase in harm. But if we continue doing more of the same, things will continue to get worse,” says Helm.

Helm says the Drug Foundation's report Safer Drug Laws for Aotearoa NZ provides a template for reform. (ref. https://drugfoundation.org.nz/topics/policy-and-advocacy/safer-drug-laws )